[00:00] (0.08s)
so here's what I want to do I want to
[00:02] (2.08s)
level set what is a staff engineer right
[00:04] (4.28s)
so this is a a chart that I stole from
[00:06] (6.72s)
staff.com it's a great resource if you
[00:09] (9.24s)
all want to check it out I have no
[00:10] (10.48s)
affiliation with them but generally the
[00:12] (12.48s)
way these things work in the engineering
[00:14] (14.60s)
world is you have a entry level engineer
[00:17] (17.08s)
and then midlevel and then Senior and
[00:18] (18.80s)
that's where it becomes interesting you
[00:19] (19.96s)
can either go down the IC ladder which
[00:21] (21.64s)
is a yellow box or you can become a
[00:24] (24.76s)
manager but at at a lot of companies
[00:27] (27.88s)
senior is like a terminal level and
[00:29] (29.32s)
that's where you have options and that's
[00:30] (30.72s)
why it's important to like get to that
[00:32] (32.72s)
point and then you can decide okay do I
[00:33] (33.92s)
want to go down the IC ladder or
[00:35] (35.20s)
management we're talking about the
[00:37] (37.12s)
decision here if you want to pursue
[00:39] (39.64s)
going down that individual contributor
[00:41] (41.52s)
ladder and staff engineer is
[00:43] (43.92s)
particularly interesting because that's
[00:45] (45.48s)
where I consider you're the first true
[00:48] (48.88s)
level where you have to be a leader you
[00:50] (50.96s)
have to even if you're not a manager
[00:52] (52.20s)
you're a leader as a individual engineer
[00:55] (55.24s)
and not everyone gets the staff engineer
[00:57] (57.36s)
it is a very challenging promotion it's
[00:59] (59.56s)
also worth calling out that it's Unique
[01:03] (63.16s)
in the engineering world that you have a
[01:05] (65.24s)
viable path to getting paid more and
[01:07] (67.40s)
having more influence and more scope as
[01:09] (69.60s)
an individual not as a manager if you
[01:11] (71.80s)
think about a salesperson for example or
[01:14] (74.48s)
maybe even like a product manager it's
[01:16] (76.44s)
very challenging but I don't think
[01:18] (78.52s)
there's such a thing as like a
[01:19] (79.52s)
distinguished salesperson like the way
[01:21] (81.76s)
you acrew more compensation and more
[01:23] (83.56s)
scope as a salesperson is you go and
[01:25] (85.44s)
manage more sales people but engineering
[01:27] (87.44s)
is unique in that we have leverage we
[01:28] (88.92s)
have tools at our dispos osal that allow
[01:30] (90.96s)
us to make ourselves or other people
[01:33] (93.24s)
more productive and that's a pretty
[01:34] (94.76s)
magical thing I think about our role as
[01:37] (97.68s)
an engineer and I think it's worth just
[01:39] (99.76s)
reflecting on that and we'll probably
[01:41] (101.00s)
talk about that today just one other
[01:42] (102.76s)
thing I want to talk about here is like
[01:44] (104.20s)
one way to think about the progression
[01:46] (106.00s)
is what is your scope as you progress
[01:48] (108.76s)
the ladder right so entry level you're
[01:50] (110.04s)
talking about a task and then a feature
[01:52] (112.00s)
and a project and when you get to staff
[01:53] (113.40s)
you're talking about multiple projects
[01:54] (114.92s)
or maybe even a whole product right so
[01:56] (116.96s)
you really are talking about many people
[01:59] (119.08s)
being impacted many different parts of
[02:01] (121.28s)
the code base and then you go all the
[02:03] (123.08s)
way up to principle or distinguished and
[02:05] (125.60s)
then you have perhaps impact across the
[02:08] (128.32s)
whole industry like you've invented some
[02:09] (129.92s)
open source framework or some way of
[02:12] (132.08s)
doing like a methodology that is adopted
[02:14] (134.28s)
across the whole company or industry
[02:16] (136.48s)
okay so I'll pause there and now let's
[02:18] (138.96s)
go into open Q&A I have a couple
[02:21] (141.40s)
prepared and maybe the one that I would
[02:24] (144.68s)
like to start with is that a big part of
[02:26] (146.84s)
being a staff engineer is getting enough
[02:30] (150.12s)
scope to justify the promotion and not
[02:33] (153.12s)
all problems that you can tackle are
[02:34] (154.48s)
created equal and so I'm curious for
[02:36] (156.80s)
each of you how did you identify which
[02:39] (159.40s)
problems in your career are actually
[02:41] (161.60s)
worth solving does that make sense
[02:43] (163.56s)
because you could work on menial bug
[02:45] (165.16s)
fixes that never get you promoted how
[02:46] (166.80s)
did you all figure out what to work on
[02:49] (169.60s)
yeah I can jump in here so I when I was
[02:52] (172.76s)
at Netflix I actually was that's where I
[02:55] (175.12s)
felt like I was at that inflection point
[02:56] (176.60s)
between senior and staff and initially I
[02:58] (178.80s)
was working on like these
[03:00] (180.44s)
detection projects of trying to detect
[03:02] (182.72s)
threat actors and all this stuff with
[03:04] (184.68s)
Flink and they were trying to build out
[03:06] (186.96s)
this thing called like a sockless
[03:09] (189.00s)
security system like a it's like a
[03:10] (190.64s)
security system without a security
[03:12] (192.24s)
Operation Center and it was like all
[03:14] (194.12s)
just automated and one of the things I
[03:15] (195.92s)
recognized pretty quickly was that this
[03:18] (198.84s)
was a lot that this was a lot that this
[03:21] (201.48s)
was not this was like almost too
[03:23] (203.20s)
ambitious and so um I noticed that there
[03:25] (205.88s)
was another project that we were working
[03:27] (207.36s)
on which was like this graph database
[03:29] (209.24s)
that was going to hold on to all the
[03:31] (211.36s)
information on like applications
[03:33] (213.64s)
databases data sets customer data like
[03:37] (217.00s)
all the different connections of just
[03:38] (218.92s)
everything in the infrastructure and it
[03:40] (220.40s)
was going to be that fundamental
[03:42] (222.68s)
infrastructure and they were like hey
[03:43] (223.88s)
Zach do you want to work on this and I'm
[03:45] (225.08s)
like that sounds like something that is
[03:47] (227.32s)
g to give value even if even if it
[03:50] (230.32s)
doesn't get used for that case right it
[03:52] (232.36s)
has branching use cases and I recognized
[03:55] (235.80s)
that I needed to get off of detection
[03:57] (237.32s)
and onto that and that's really where
[04:00] (240.36s)
that's when Netflix gave me a lot more
[04:01] (241.76s)
money that's when I definitely got a lot
[04:04] (244.00s)
more respect from people at Netflix and
[04:05] (245.88s)
I definitely felt like I was in that
[04:07] (247.48s)
more leadership role after I transition
[04:09] (249.80s)
to that and I think that was the big
[04:11] (251.28s)
thing I recognized was that like more
[04:13] (253.16s)
than just like what you were saying that
[04:14] (254.60s)
rul about you don't want to be working
[04:16] (256.08s)
on like tasks or things that don't have
[04:17] (257.72s)
enough scope but you also don't want to
[04:19] (259.68s)
be working on projects that are like
[04:21] (261.72s)
high in the sky and projects that like
[04:23] (263.80s)
are risky right that might not even pan
[04:26] (266.12s)
out right because that's also very
[04:28] (268.32s)
important what I've seen the more senior
[04:31] (271.44s)
people get the more they have this
[04:34] (274.12s)
muscle to determine how much impact
[04:37] (277.44s)
there is in a project before investing
[04:39] (279.56s)
time into it and so you might experience
[04:42] (282.08s)
this where you're asking more senior
[04:44] (284.20s)
person for some small change and they
[04:46] (286.60s)
might actually never get to it because
[04:48] (288.92s)
they have that muscle and they're
[04:50] (290.56s)
checking it they might be quick to
[04:52] (292.04s)
backlog things and at the same time if
[04:54] (294.72s)
you are able to show them projects that
[04:57] (297.44s)
have particular scope maybe they involve
[05:00] (300.08s)
many different orgs or maybe the metrics
[05:02] (302.88s)
and road map Milestones that they're
[05:04] (304.96s)
achieving are quite important to the org
[05:06] (306.88s)
like maybe it's something that matters
[05:08] (308.84s)
to a group of 30 people rather than
[05:10] (310.92s)
something that's like a small thing
[05:12] (312.64s)
within a team developing that ability to
[05:16] (316.16s)
see what matters and see what is
[05:18] (318.00s)
impactful and then invest your time
[05:20] (320.28s)
accordingly is really important and how
[05:23] (323.00s)
do you develop that muscle Ryan is it
[05:24] (324.40s)
just like looking at past projects and
[05:26] (326.24s)
figure out what worked yeah I think the
[05:28] (328.56s)
way that I developed that is through
[05:31] (331.56s)
looking at the incentives of the org so
[05:33] (333.96s)
you can see most teams publish plans and
[05:36] (336.08s)
you can see some team is planning on
[05:38] (338.24s)
moving this metric by 5% or something
[05:41] (341.28s)
like that and I have an idea that's
[05:42] (342.92s)
going to move it by 7% or something in
[05:45] (345.96s)
my mind I'm thinking okay that project
[05:47] (347.96s)
if I do that that achieves A Team level
[05:50] (350.52s)
goal so it's somewhat substantial also
[05:53] (353.32s)
there's some intuition too I think at
[05:55] (355.60s)
some point I worked on some ads projects
[05:58] (358.52s)
even though it was like completely
[05:59] (359.68s)
unrelated to my team just because I saw
[06:02] (362.28s)
okay there's a pretty substantial
[06:03] (363.64s)
opportunity for revenue and I just knew
[06:06] (366.28s)
that okay this is going to be good for
[06:07] (367.72s)
the business and it turned out that it
[06:09] (369.80s)
it was quite impactful and that led to
[06:12] (372.08s)
my senior promotion so it was something
[06:14] (374.20s)
that no one really assigned to me and I
[06:16] (376.24s)
was just digging around for ways to have
[06:19] (379.28s)
impact and then one quick logistical
[06:21] (381.88s)
note so there are a bunch of questions
[06:23] (383.24s)
coming in chat so please keep those
[06:24] (384.72s)
coming for questions that you also want
[06:27] (387.08s)
answered then give a reaction to it and
[06:28] (388.84s)
that'll help the five of us prioritize
[06:31] (391.04s)
what we want to tackle I have a question
[06:33] (393.32s)
for Karly and Lee given that you both
[06:35] (395.00s)
have management experience a very
[06:37] (397.12s)
tactical one is do you like or when you
[06:40] (400.16s)
were going through the ranks to a staff
[06:41] (401.64s)
engineer how explicit were you that I
[06:43] (403.92s)
want to be a staff engineer help me
[06:46] (406.28s)
here's the timeline and like how
[06:47] (407.64s)
transparent was that conversation with
[06:49] (409.44s)
the manager and maybe
[06:51] (411.88s)
relatedly what do you look for what
[06:54] (414.08s)
advice would you share with people here
[06:55] (415.84s)
to look for in a manager who can support
[06:58] (418.24s)
them to get to this high of a level yeah
[07:01] (421.92s)
that's an interesting question so I
[07:04] (424.48s)
manage staff Engineers now as part of my
[07:07] (427.68s)
role and I will say that everyone
[07:11] (431.84s)
handles whether they feel comfortable
[07:14] (434.24s)
asking for a promotion differently a lot
[07:16] (436.76s)
of the time I'd say 50% of the time that
[07:19] (439.12s)
I've been approached about wanting a
[07:20] (440.96s)
promotion to staff level I've felt that
[07:24] (444.04s)
person wasn't ready and the other half
[07:25] (445.92s)
of the time I felt that person was ready
[07:27] (447.68s)
a long time ago and so it's really a
[07:30] (450.32s)
personality thing I think the people who
[07:32] (452.16s)
feel most comfortable asking maybe are
[07:35] (455.04s)
the ones that do a lot more
[07:36] (456.20s)
self-promotion and maybe feel like they
[07:38] (458.12s)
want to take on ambitious projects even
[07:39] (459.96s)
when they haven't shown that they're
[07:41] (461.08s)
ready and then the other group of people
[07:43] (463.64s)
are the people who feel like they have
[07:45] (465.12s)
to do a lot to prove exactly that
[07:47] (467.00s)
they're ready and maybe get one year
[07:49] (469.36s)
past being ready before they feel
[07:51] (471.24s)
comfortable asking I don't know the best
[07:53] (473.84s)
way to go about this or how you balance
[07:55] (475.84s)
either one of those things I think it's
[07:58] (478.12s)
probably healthy to do some self
[07:59] (479.68s)
reflection and see if you actually think
[08:01] (481.48s)
you're ready but also not set the bar so
[08:04] (484.64s)
high for yourself if you're a shy type
[08:07] (487.48s)
of person that you end up holding
[08:09] (489.76s)
yourself back by not asking soon enough
[08:12] (492.52s)
um and it's been funny I've very rarely
[08:14] (494.24s)
seen anyone ask for it like right when
[08:16] (496.04s)
they're ready either too early or a
[08:18] (498.00s)
little too late yeah so my take on that
[08:20] (500.76s)
and the sort of like people asking about
[08:23] (503.72s)
it or seeking it is that there there is
[08:27] (507.48s)
this difference in people who are really
[08:30] (510.40s)
ambitious and really want to move up
[08:32] (512.08s)
quickly and they might have sometimes an
[08:35] (515.52s)
inflated sense of self and like where
[08:38] (518.08s)
they're at and then the other people
[08:40] (520.04s)
that are maybe more reserved are like oh
[08:42] (522.20s)
I've been told that promotions are
[08:44] (524.00s)
trailing so even if I'm performing at
[08:46] (526.68s)
that level I shouldn't ask about it yet
[08:48] (528.48s)
because I haven't been doing it for long
[08:50] (530.24s)
enough and my take is while it's true at
[08:53] (533.20s)
a lot of big tech companies promotions
[08:55] (535.00s)
are trailing if you aren't having the
[08:57] (537.80s)
conversation then you don't know know
[08:59] (539.64s)
what you're missing and you may think
[09:01] (541.44s)
that you're knocking it out of the park
[09:02] (542.76s)
and you're just waiting for your manager
[09:04] (544.28s)
to hand you a promotion or tell you
[09:05] (545.96s)
they're putting you up and you haven't
[09:08] (548.00s)
even asked and they're like oh yeah your
[09:09] (549.64s)
Tech is solid but you haven't done
[09:11] (551.60s)
anything to improve the lives of the
[09:13] (553.12s)
engineers on the team or reached out
[09:15] (555.16s)
across teams or presented your work to
[09:18] (558.04s)
Executives like you're missing a lot
[09:20] (560.12s)
like we need to cover that and you
[09:21] (561.60s)
hadn't mentioned you wanted to be
[09:22] (562.92s)
promoted and people will of course I
[09:25] (565.00s)
want to be promoted that's not true as
[09:28] (568.28s)
having managed people not everyone wants
[09:30] (570.92s)
a promotion or wants to pursue that now
[09:32] (572.92s)
it might be that they don't want to take
[09:35] (575.36s)
that work on and they may never want to
[09:37] (577.04s)
be promoted and if they're in a terminal
[09:38] (578.60s)
role at senior why they may not want it
[09:41] (581.16s)
so you need to actually Express that you
[09:43] (583.00s)
are interested but you don't have to
[09:45] (585.04s)
express it when you're you think you're
[09:46] (586.96s)
ready you can express I am interested in
[09:50] (590.64s)
moving up the technical track I don't
[09:52] (592.28s)
want to move to management and I don't
[09:53] (593.76s)
want to stay at my current level I do
[09:55] (595.80s)
want to move up but I don't think that
[09:57] (597.36s)
I'm ready now I just want your
[09:59] (599.00s)
perspective perspective on What's
[10:00] (600.68s)
Missing and I want us to start making a
[10:02] (602.28s)
plan and working on documentation so
[10:04] (604.88s)
that when I am ready you have all the
[10:06] (606.60s)
collateral you need but you can talk
[10:09] (609.20s)
about your career in that way with your
[10:10] (610.72s)
manager it is really important that you
[10:12] (612.96s)
share that is what your interest is
[10:14] (614.92s)
because they may not know otherwise and
[10:17] (617.20s)
they may not they may be like oh yeah
[10:18] (618.88s)
they're doing a really solid job for
[10:20] (620.92s)
them to get a high rating in this role I
[10:22] (622.56s)
need them to do this work that might be
[10:24] (624.60s)
different work than I they want to take
[10:27] (627.52s)
on something that requires more leader
[10:29] (629.28s)
ership and that isn't going to check the
[10:32] (632.36s)
boxes on their current roles rubric for
[10:34] (634.48s)
them to get the very highest rating but
[10:36] (636.68s)
it may set the stage for them to get
[10:38] (638.88s)
promoted and those could be like
[10:40] (640.48s)
different so even if you're a high
[10:41] (641.84s)
performer they may not be thinking like
[10:43] (643.68s)
yeah we're going to promote you in the
[10:44] (644.84s)
next few quarters and that's a great
[10:47] (647.24s)
Point Lee about promotions being
[10:48] (648.60s)
trailing at many of these companies
[10:50] (650.00s)
there's a very related question Carly
[10:51] (651.56s)
for you you mentioned that half the
[10:53] (653.88s)
people who came for the promotion were
[10:56] (656.32s)
ready they were ready for a year they
[10:58] (658.60s)
had been ready
[10:59] (659.76s)
so Diana I think is asking would you
[11:02] (662.60s)
promote someone without asking or do you
[11:05] (665.12s)
always want to get their permission want
[11:06] (666.60s)
them to initiate what has been your
[11:08] (668.36s)
philosophy with that I think it can go
[11:10] (670.56s)
both ways I've I can think of times
[11:12] (672.64s)
where I have come to someone with a
[11:14] (674.44s)
promotion when they haven't necessarily
[11:15] (675.96s)
asked and been like I think you're ready
[11:17] (677.28s)
for this do you want this but the
[11:19] (679.20s)
majority of the time I have 44 Engineers
[11:21] (681.88s)
under me like I can't necessarily keep
[11:24] (684.20s)
track of every single person's
[11:25] (685.96s)
progression at every single point at the
[11:28] (688.44s)
year-end reviews it's a good time for me
[11:30] (690.20s)
to reflect but if you feel ready or you
[11:34] (694.00s)
feel like you're going above and beyond
[11:35] (695.52s)
in between them don't wait for me to
[11:37] (697.44s)
come to you at your yearend review right
[11:39] (699.84s)
that's the best Cadence for me because
[11:41] (701.88s)
that's when I have the most to reflect
[11:43] (703.68s)
on the past year I'm doing planning for
[11:46] (706.04s)
the next year I'm trying to see where we
[11:48] (708.12s)
want to grow our team and how we want to
[11:49] (709.48s)
grow alongside the business I think that
[11:52] (712.64s)
if you wait for that's taking kind of a
[11:54] (714.48s)
passive approach to your own career and
[11:56] (716.32s)
your own life it's better to be more
[11:58] (718.72s)
active than than not right in the same
[12:00] (720.88s)
vein it's better to ask too early than
[12:03] (723.40s)
too late for my opinion because I see
[12:05] (725.40s)
very little downside to asking too early
[12:07] (727.76s)
other than like Lee said getting
[12:09] (729.16s)
feedback on where you can grow as long
[12:11] (731.60s)
as you can take feedback right and I
[12:13] (733.84s)
think that's the big distinction if
[12:15] (735.76s)
you're going to ask for a promotion and
[12:17] (737.76s)
you're told that it's too early be
[12:20] (740.56s)
willing to hear the feedback because you
[12:22] (742.60s)
probably have blind spots that you're
[12:24] (744.40s)
not seeing your promotion doesn't come
[12:26] (746.80s)
out of my paycheck right it doesn't
[12:28] (748.96s)
really affect me necessarily if I feel
[12:31] (751.16s)
like you're ready it's in my best
[12:33] (753.16s)
interest to fight for you as your
[12:35] (755.08s)
manager there's no reason why I would
[12:37] (757.40s)
want to gate keep that from you if I'm a
[12:39] (759.80s)
good manager we've all had toxic people
[12:41] (761.32s)
in our lives so forget that those people
[12:43] (763.00s)
exist for a second and just assume that
[12:44] (764.56s)
everyone is well intentioned if your
[12:46] (766.44s)
manager says you're not ready it's not
[12:48] (768.32s)
because they're setting some sort of
[12:49] (769.80s)
unreasonable precedent or they're
[12:52] (772.04s)
wanting to be gatekeeping most likely
[12:55] (775.20s)
it's because you have a blind spot that
[12:56] (776.72s)
you're not seeing and how you handle
[12:59] (779.40s)
feedback is as much a part of whether I
[13:01] (781.76s)
think you're ready for promotion as
[13:03] (783.24s)
anything else because to me a staff
[13:05] (785.48s)
engineer needs to be able to hear
[13:07] (787.84s)
feedback from their leaders hear
[13:09] (789.76s)
feedback from their team implement it
[13:12] (792.40s)
maturely and be self-reflective and if
[13:15] (795.44s)
you take feedback and you get mad or you
[13:17] (797.80s)
argue or you say I'm actually ready
[13:19] (799.60s)
because of X Y and Z and you get
[13:21] (801.76s)
combative you're further proving the
[13:23] (803.84s)
point that you're not necessarily ready
[13:26] (806.24s)
so I'd say asking early doesn't have
[13:28] (808.48s)
many downsides sides unless you're not
[13:30] (810.40s)
someone who can handle feedback and
[13:31] (811.84s)
handle hearing the word no and I want to
[13:34] (814.04s)
put a really fine point on what Karly
[13:36] (816.28s)
just said about like your ability to
[13:39] (819.12s)
take feedback and what you do with
[13:41] (821.00s)
feedback being an indicator in and of
[13:43] (823.92s)
itself the first time my manager tried
[13:46] (826.88s)
to promote me to L6 as a manager at
[13:49] (829.68s)
Amazon it didn't go through and when he
[13:52] (832.56s)
came to me I was very tactical about it
[13:56] (836.04s)
and was like okay cool so what was
[13:58] (838.08s)
missing what were the biggest objections
[14:00] (840.24s)
how are we going to fix that going
[14:02] (842.52s)
through each thing and being like okay
[14:04] (844.24s)
what's the artifact for that you're
[14:05] (845.48s)
saying that I'm missing this how are we
[14:07] (847.28s)
going to show the next time that's not
[14:09] (849.28s)
the problem and a month later I went on
[14:12] (852.04s)
paternity leave and then when I came
[14:14] (854.24s)
back I was promoted I didn't really do
[14:17] (857.00s)
anything different except ask how to fix
[14:20] (860.52s)
it and come up with the ideas of what we
[14:23] (863.12s)
going to fill the Gap and that was
[14:25] (865.92s)
essentially like what pushed it over so
[14:28] (868.60s)
that will nness to hear the feedback and
[14:30] (870.76s)
take action on it was what got me
[14:32] (872.64s)
promoted not doing one more project or
[14:35] (875.64s)
my team doing one more project so just
[14:39] (879.04s)
she's right what I want to just add one
[14:41] (881.52s)
more thing here about this though
[14:42] (882.96s)
because if you disagree with the
[14:44] (884.64s)
feedback and you actually do think that
[14:47] (887.88s)
like it's [ __ ] interview and see
[14:50] (890.44s)
what happens and uh maybe another
[14:52] (892.60s)
company will agree with you and that's
[14:55] (895.24s)
what's happened in my career and that's
[14:56] (896.96s)
because I've only ever been promoted one
[14:58] (898.76s)
time in my career and that was from
[15:00] (900.40s)
Junior to midlevel every other promotion
[15:02] (902.52s)
has come from a hop yeah you don't have
[15:04] (904.72s)
to freaking like if you if you have a
[15:06] (906.80s)
manager who's trying to carrot and stick
[15:08] (908.32s)
your ass like all the way up and all
[15:10] (910.20s)
that stuff freaking like maybe just
[15:11] (911.88s)
leave that's like another option that is
[15:13] (913.88s)
also an equally viable option that can
[15:16] (916.20s)
also work but you also still need to
[15:18] (918.28s)
learn how to take feedback I'm not
[15:19] (919.52s)
saying I'm not trying to be like oh yeah
[15:21] (921.08s)
don't take any feedback always just
[15:22] (922.80s)
leave I'm not that that far right but
[15:26] (926.08s)
like sometimes like there are managers
[15:28] (928.32s)
out there who do give you feedback that
[15:29] (929.92s)
are that is absolutely ridiculous that
[15:31] (931.88s)
is like not true and they actually don't
[15:33] (933.76s)
know who you are and so that's where
[15:35] (935.84s)
interviewing outside especially if
[15:37] (937.32s)
you're getting feedback that you
[15:38] (938.32s)
disagree with that is a very good thing
[15:40] (940.36s)
because then the market will tell you if
[15:41] (941.76s)
you're ready as well the market will
[15:43] (943.20s)
tell you Carly I 100% agree with you
[15:45] (945.76s)
about you should ask too early like one
[15:49] (949.52s)
thing that has become increasingly
[15:51] (951.60s)
obvious to me throughout my career is
[15:54] (954.48s)
that expression of the squeaky wheel
[15:56] (956.96s)
gets the greas if you want attention you
[15:59] (959.60s)
want money you want anything Make Some
[16:01] (961.56s)
Noise right if you want to talk about
[16:03] (963.12s)
how great your work is you want to talk
[16:04] (964.32s)
about promotion you have to advocate for
[16:06] (966.52s)
yourself and you have to talk about it I
[16:09] (969.28s)
think the Nuance here is the phrasing of
[16:12] (972.08s)
it how you frame yourself and what you
[16:14] (974.96s)
want matters a ton I think that's Lee
[16:16] (976.52s)
you were alluding to that a little bit
[16:18] (978.48s)
if you say hey I joined the company a
[16:20] (980.52s)
week ago I want to get promoted you're
[16:22] (982.52s)
not going to get very many Advocates on
[16:24] (984.60s)
your team or your manager probably won't
[16:26] (986.20s)
advocate for you but if instead you
[16:27] (987.80s)
frame it as hey I'm new my goal my
[16:30] (990.60s)
number one goal right now is I want to
[16:32] (992.08s)
ramp up I want to have a ton of impact I
[16:34] (994.08s)
want to help the people on the team but
[16:36] (996.24s)
would you be okay in three months can we
[16:38] (998.64s)
have a check-in about what promotion
[16:40] (1000.40s)
looks like right if I was a manager I
[16:43] (1003.44s)
would 100% say yeah I'm totally aligned
[16:45] (1005.24s)
with you right now focus on ramping up
[16:46] (1006.96s)
Landing some tasks writing some code and
[16:49] (1009.32s)
then in three months I am more than
[16:50] (1010.80s)
happy to figure out how you're trending
[16:52] (1012.52s)
and what you can do to get promoted that
[16:54] (1014.12s)
way you've communicated that you really
[16:55] (1015.28s)
care about promotion but your priorities
[16:57] (1017.68s)
are straight like your priorities are
[16:59] (1019.60s)
correct at least from the team
[17:01] (1021.04s)
perspective so I feel like the the way
[17:03] (1023.36s)
you advocate for yourself matters a lot
[17:05] (1025.60s)
definitely yeah and I would just add
[17:07] (1027.56s)
asking for promotions early talking
[17:09] (1029.52s)
about it explicitly I know some people
[17:12] (1032.16s)
feel a little uncomfortable about doing
[17:14] (1034.00s)
that or maybe like it's asking for too
[17:15] (1035.76s)
much but it's just definitely better
[17:19] (1039.76s)
I've experienced it at every point
[17:22] (1042.32s)
before getting promoted I was very
[17:24] (1044.40s)
explicit about hey I'm this level what
[17:27] (1047.28s)
do I need to do to get to the next level
[17:29] (1049.48s)
and it was not an uncomfortable
[17:31] (1051.44s)
conversation and my manager was also
[17:34] (1054.36s)
happy about it too because he wants me
[17:36] (1056.16s)
to grow because then his team is having
[17:38] (1058.44s)
more impact and in some cases too when
[17:41] (1061.00s)
they would say oh you're probably going
[17:42] (1062.64s)
to get promoted to this level I would
[17:45] (1065.04s)
ask even about the next level after that
[17:47] (1067.44s)
because thinking okay this one's
[17:48] (1068.72s)
probably going to go through what's the
[17:50] (1070.40s)
next thing I can do how can I keep going
[17:52] (1072.92s)
and keep that momentum so that's even
[17:55] (1075.76s)
more cringe if you don't like asking for
[17:57] (1077.72s)
promos to ask for two in advance but you
[18:00] (1080.44s)
totally can my manager is not upset at
[18:02] (1082.56s)
all and it worked really well and Rahul
[18:05] (1085.60s)
you mentioned about like Leverage when
[18:07] (1087.76s)
you're interviewing you have leverage
[18:09] (1089.56s)
but also I've seen that you can also
[18:11] (1091.28s)
have leverage within a company if you're
[18:13] (1093.56s)
a really high performer your manager
[18:16] (1096.12s)
wants to retain you so if you ask for
[18:19] (1099.04s)
things and you've been doing a lot of
[18:21] (1101.04s)
great work or you've been solving a lot
[18:22] (1102.80s)
of their problems they you'll see that
[18:25] (1105.12s)
they're a lot more receptive to helping
[18:27] (1107.60s)
you with your career growth or getting
[18:29] (1109.52s)
things done whereas if you're a less
[18:31] (1111.56s)
High achieving person you might be lower
[18:33] (1113.40s)
in their list of priorities so there's
[18:35] (1115.60s)
also ways to have leverage within if you
[18:38] (1118.16s)
get a lot of things done for them and
[18:39] (1119.72s)
you're really critical piece of the team
[18:42] (1122.00s)
but what is also true with that is like
[18:43] (1123.92s)
your manager can't snap their fingers
[18:45] (1125.60s)
most places and promote you there are
[18:47] (1127.68s)
processes that they have to work through
[18:49] (1129.48s)
there's other people making the decision
[18:51] (1131.96s)
what is true is they do have control
[18:53] (1133.88s)
over a lot of things and you can have
[18:56] (1136.52s)
leverage with them to say I really need
[18:58] (1138.16s)
projects that are like feeding the areas
[19:00] (1140.80s)
that you say I'm missing towards
[19:02] (1142.48s)
promotions if I can't get that on this
[19:04] (1144.56s)
team let's just be honest about that and
[19:06] (1146.52s)
let me find a different team where I can
[19:08] (1148.56s)
or look outside that is real that is a
[19:11] (1151.32s)
thing that they can really affect but
[19:12] (1152.84s)
they can't just say oh you know what
[19:15] (1155.20s)
you're saying promote you or leave yeah
[19:17] (1157.72s)
I'll promote you today it's just not
[19:19] (1159.28s)
real unless it's a really tiny company
[19:21] (1161.08s)
or like you work for the CEO or
[19:22] (1162.76s)
something so yeah like I know when I was
[19:25] (1165.32s)
at Airbnb all promotions before the
[19:27] (1167.88s)
staff promo
[19:29] (1169.36s)
were like essentially controlled by the
[19:32] (1172.48s)
manager if the manager thought you were
[19:33] (1173.84s)
ready you could get promoted to mid
[19:35] (1175.32s)
level or to senior but senior to staff
[19:37] (1177.72s)
that and and any promotion after that
[19:39] (1179.40s)
was promotion by committee and I was
[19:41] (1181.44s)
always like I don't know about these
[19:43] (1183.44s)
committees bro even at Amazon when there
[19:46] (1186.12s)
wasn't like committees for promo it was
[19:48] (1188.60s)
like skip level normally like senior
[19:51] (1191.68s)
manager up through through senior but
[19:54] (1194.80s)
then like director for principal keep
[19:57] (1197.72s)
going up the management chain so it
[20:00] (1200.08s)
didn't it still wasn't up to your
[20:02] (1202.40s)
manager unless again you were a senior
[20:04] (1204.72s)
engineer working for a director which
[20:06] (1206.48s)
would be somewhat unusual like it
[20:09] (1209.56s)
happened it wasn't just like your
[20:11] (1211.64s)
manager even there where there wasn't
[20:13] (1213.68s)
panels yeah yeah that's interesting that
[20:16] (1216.28s)
you mentioned that Zach about lower
[20:17] (1217.88s)
levels more in control for your manager
[20:20] (1220.40s)
I definitely noticed that if you're
[20:21] (1221.56s)
trying to get promoted from Junior to
[20:23] (1223.20s)
midlevel even if a committee is making
[20:25] (1225.48s)
the decision there's not a lot of
[20:27] (1227.32s)
ambiguity in that promo what your
[20:29] (1229.24s)
manager says is probably what's going to
[20:31] (1231.44s)
happen it's really important that you
[20:33] (1233.56s)
and your manager are aligned and then at
[20:36] (1236.24s)
the highest levels yeah you're going to
[20:37] (1237.80s)
need to get sign off from VPS and Edge
[20:39] (1239.96s)
leads and your manager becomes more and
[20:42] (1242.00s)
more of a messenger middleman for that
[20:44] (1244.16s)
committee and that's why it's even more
[20:46] (1246.04s)
important to say you want to get
[20:47] (1247.20s)
promoted earlier because then they can
[20:48] (1248.72s)
start trying to get that feedback from
[20:50] (1250.76s)
the committee earlier and you can see
[20:53] (1253.16s)
what the company's thinking if you're
[20:55] (1255.44s)
looking at those really high levels okay
[20:57] (1257.96s)
I have just one more question and then
[21:00] (1260.16s)
hopefully we'll have time for a couple
[21:01] (1261.80s)
from the audience or maybe from the four
[21:03] (1263.44s)
of you if you want to bring up anything
[21:05] (1265.08s)
but the okay the first question I asked
[21:06] (1266.56s)
was about evaluating different projects
[21:08] (1268.84s)
the second question is about evaluating
[21:10] (1270.36s)
manager now I want to talk about
[21:11] (1271.84s)
evaluating the team so the joke I make
[21:14] (1274.56s)
to people is if you're at Apple right
[21:17] (1277.56s)
Apple has tons and tons of products and
[21:20] (1280.28s)
if you're working on garage band good
[21:22] (1282.00s)
luck atting promoted it's never going to
[21:23] (1283.68s)
happen at least not at the senior level
[21:25] (1285.00s)
like no one cares about garage band but
[21:26] (1286.92s)
if you work on the iPhone or if you work
[21:28] (1288.28s)
on one the core properties of Apple the
[21:30] (1290.80s)
likelihood is way way higher so that's
[21:32] (1292.44s)
like my at least one heuristic to use to
[21:35] (1295.44s)
evaluate what team is the better vehicle
[21:39] (1299.36s)
to get you the promotion so that's maybe
[21:41] (1301.32s)
the last question I want to ask is how
[21:43] (1303.68s)
do you all think about organization or
[21:46] (1306.36s)
team within the company to get a staff
[21:48] (1308.84s)
level promotion sure yeah I I think that
[21:53] (1313.00s)
what you're saying is definitely true
[21:55] (1315.24s)
and you can make the best of where you
[21:58] (1318.64s)
are or what teams you're looking at if
[22:00] (1320.76s)
you're working on garage band and you
[22:02] (1322.28s)
find that real-time audio response in
[22:04] (1324.28s)
the operating system is insufficient and
[22:06] (1326.64s)
you go to the team that owns that point
[22:08] (1328.96s)
that out to them show them where in
[22:10] (1330.36s)
their code or even ask if you can sit
[22:12] (1332.12s)
with their team and fix that and then
[22:14] (1334.40s)
you make that change or you affect that
[22:17] (1337.12s)
change as a strong partner that is very
[22:19] (1339.60s)
different than you made the sliders a
[22:22] (1342.00s)
little bit smoother and garage band so
[22:24] (1344.60s)
there are ways to leverage where you're
[22:26] (1346.92s)
at to have higher impact in visibility
[22:29] (1349.52s)
but certainly if you are on the flagship
[22:31] (1351.64s)
product that visibility comes for free
[22:34] (1354.16s)
for me the most important thing wasn't
[22:36] (1356.24s)
necessarily the project that I was
[22:37] (1357.68s)
working on being high impact it was if I
[22:40] (1360.28s)
cared about the project I was working on
[22:42] (1362.24s)
because that's when I can do my best
[22:44] (1364.12s)
work so if I was working on challenging
[22:47] (1367.08s)
problems that I found interesting I
[22:49] (1369.12s)
would almost always flourish because I
[22:51] (1371.76s)
could give my best and I could step up
[22:53] (1373.56s)
to meet any Challenge and I felt
[22:56] (1376.48s)
interested to dive in and get into the
[22:58] (1378.24s)
week needs and really solve the problems
[23:00] (1380.52s)
facing our users and if you also are a
[23:03] (1383.00s)
user of the product and you're like
[23:04] (1384.96s)
passionate about it depending on what it
[23:06] (1386.36s)
is it's going to be so much easier for
[23:08] (1388.56s)
you to give it your all to show up to be
[23:11] (1391.56s)
a good Advocate to influence other
[23:13] (1393.96s)
people it's hard to do that when you
[23:16] (1396.04s)
don't give a [ __ ] about what you're
[23:17] (1397.16s)
doing so for me there was a time where I
[23:19] (1399.44s)
was interviewing at Google and they were
[23:21] (1401.04s)
like you do you want to work on ads I
[23:23] (1403.76s)
don't give a [ __ ] about that I'm not
[23:25] (1405.32s)
going to lie I that wouldn't be exciting
[23:26] (1406.88s)
to me I don't want to get up everyday
[23:28] (1408.20s)
and work on ads for some people it would
[23:30] (1410.16s)
be really fun because it's at a huge
[23:32] (1412.08s)
scale it's at a really highly
[23:33] (1413.76s)
influential part of Google's business
[23:35] (1415.56s)
obviously for me I it could have been
[23:38] (1418.08s)
the most influential project and if I
[23:39] (1419.84s)
didn't care I wasn't going to be showing
[23:41] (1421.32s)
up so that's how I've taken things in my
[23:43] (1423.72s)
career is based on my own passion as
[23:45] (1425.88s)
opposed to like the impact of the
[23:47] (1427.52s)
business and then turned my passion into
[23:49] (1429.92s)
something yeah so there's a few General
[23:52] (1432.08s)
Trends I've noticed with promotions and
[23:54] (1434.84s)
it just depends on the levels so for
[23:57] (1437.88s)
typically up to senior there is scope
[24:01] (1441.16s)
for promotion on pretty much any team
[24:04] (1444.56s)
anywhere at least from what I've seen
[24:06] (1446.68s)
within Fang if you're looking for
[24:08] (1448.88s)
promotions past senior so L6 plus it
[24:12] (1452.72s)
becomes a little more nuanced and I've
[24:14] (1454.52s)
seen that there's generally certain
[24:15] (1455.96s)
teams that uh can get promoted more
[24:19] (1459.08s)
easily this all depends you know on
[24:21] (1461.68s)
those particular team situation but one
[24:24] (1464.48s)
cut that is interesting to think about
[24:26] (1466.68s)
is product teams versus INF structure
[24:28] (1468.96s)
teams past L5 so going into staff and
[24:32] (1472.76s)
hire I've generally tended to see that
[24:35] (1475.84s)
there's a lot more senior Engineers on
[24:37] (1477.88s)
infrastructure teams and my thinking for
[24:41] (1481.56s)
why that is the case is product
[24:43] (1483.40s)
Engineers the way that you have huge
[24:46] (1486.08s)
impact past L6 is typically through
[24:49] (1489.36s)
leverage of controlling large projects
[24:51] (1491.96s)
with many different Engineers on them
[24:54] (1494.08s)
and there's a limited number of those
[24:55] (1495.48s)
spots so if you want to be the one
[24:57] (1497.28s)
building the overhaul of some major
[25:00] (1500.36s)
product experience you want to be that
[25:01] (1501.52s)
Tech lead one person for 60 Engineers so
[25:04] (1504.76s)
there's a lot less spots for that
[25:06] (1506.80s)
whereas on infrastructure teams people
[25:09] (1509.28s)
who are building underlying pieces that
[25:11] (1511.96s)
are very technically complicated and
[25:14] (1514.28s)
they help everyone at the company move
[25:16] (1516.68s)
faster there's natural leverage in the
[25:19] (1519.44s)
technology itself and so there's a lot
[25:22] (1522.04s)
more roles and opportunities I've seen
[25:25] (1525.56s)
on infrastructure teams specifically for
[25:27] (1527.60s)
these very tail more senior promos past
[25:30] (1530.96s)
L6 and and onwards and I've definitely
[25:32] (1532.96s)
experienced that I'm on an
[25:34] (1534.16s)
infrastructure team and my team is quite
[25:36] (1536.84s)
senior relative to other teams that I've
[25:39] (1539.24s)
seen and I think it's just a natural
[25:42] (1542.04s)
setup for how the ORS are set up and The
[25:45] (1545.28s)
Leverage that you get from the
[25:46] (1546.36s)
technology versus The Leverage of
[25:48] (1548.92s)
leading a team yeah I want to follow up
[25:51] (1551.16s)
there because I've actually been in both
[25:52] (1552.68s)
positions there at Netflix I was more of
[25:55] (1555.28s)
like a tech lead staff person on
[25:57] (1557.32s)
infrastructure team building out like
[25:58] (1558.96s)
that graph database and then at Airbnb I
[26:01] (1561.48s)
was like the tech lead on pricing and
[26:03] (1563.24s)
availability where I was more of a
[26:04] (1564.88s)
product like Tech lead data engineer and
[26:07] (1567.60s)
I've noticed especially in data
[26:08] (1568.92s)
engineering that is even more the case
[26:11] (1571.08s)
where it's like the more you lean into
[26:13] (1573.12s)
more of like infrastructure and you're
[26:15] (1575.16s)
not just like building like singular
[26:16] (1576.92s)
pipelines but you're building like how
[26:19] (1579.16s)
stuff is uh being done if you're
[26:21] (1581.08s)
focusing more on the how work gets done
[26:23] (1583.16s)
as opposed to what work gets done that
[26:26] (1586.04s)
is definitely something I've noticed as
[26:28] (1588.00s)
as get further along the ladder that you
[26:30] (1590.00s)
need to have more of that because then
[26:31] (1591.64s)
it's like if you are changing how other
[26:33] (1593.84s)
Engineers are doing their job and like
[26:36] (1596.00s)
you're saving Engineers five 10 minutes
[26:38] (1598.36s)
a day but then that scales across
[26:40] (1600.36s)
hundreds of Engineers you're saving so
[26:42] (1602.56s)
much time and energy and creating so
[26:44] (1604.44s)
much efficiency and that's a great way
[26:46] (1606.64s)
to be leveraged and I that's why I think
[26:48] (1608.64s)
I totally agree with Ryan's point on
[26:50] (1610.04s)
there's a lot more opportunities in
[26:51] (1611.48s)
infrastructure teams in big tech for
[26:53] (1613.72s)
that because of you are impacting how
[26:56] (1616.44s)
work is getting done as opposed to like
[26:58] (1618.32s)
what work is getting done and that yeah
[27:00] (1620.60s)
100% totally agree with that so I I will
[27:03] (1623.72s)
frame it a little bit differently yes
[27:06] (1626.12s)
that is true like infrastructure work
[27:08] (1628.60s)
often Bridges a number of different
[27:10] (1630.84s)
teams and has naturally a certain amount
[27:13] (1633.96s)
of impact because it might be a
[27:16] (1636.00s)
foundational piece of
[27:17] (1637.84s)
infrastructure but I think that what you
[27:20] (1640.60s)
need to see is what is the impact
[27:23] (1643.40s)
available and do managers in that space
[27:26] (1646.44s)
know how to promote people and then who
[27:29] (1649.44s)
sees the work that you do on that team
[27:31] (1651.84s)
if you're the senior most person on an
[27:34] (1654.08s)
infrastructure team and you work on a
[27:36] (1656.16s)
piece of infrastructure that no other
[27:38] (1658.36s)
senior staff engineer sees it probably
[27:41] (1661.88s)
isn't going to be a thing that can get
[27:43] (1663.76s)
you promoted so when you're evaluating
[27:46] (1666.56s)
it yes infrastructure teams tend to have
[27:49] (1669.48s)
those like opportunities more frequently
[27:52] (1672.68s)
but just because it's infrastructure
[27:54] (1674.32s)
doesn't mean it's set up for that and
[27:56] (1676.28s)
just because it's product work doesn't
[27:58] (1678.48s)
mean it isn't you still have to do the
[28:00] (1680.76s)
next level of evaluation of like what
[28:03] (1683.72s)
work do I do there that is going to have
[28:05] (1685.72s)
this impact okay so I want to go through
[28:07] (1687.48s)
a bunch of the question there's a ton of
[28:08] (1688.96s)
questions in the chat so for the last 10
[28:11] (1691.44s)
minutes we can go through a couple of
[28:13] (1693.20s)
those that I pulled out but before that
[28:15] (1695.92s)
I'm curious Zach Lee Carly Ryan if you
[28:18] (1698.08s)
have anything that you saw was
[28:19] (1699.88s)
particularly interesting or anything
[28:21] (1701.32s)
else that we haven't covered so far that
[28:22] (1702.56s)
you want to talk about I'm cool to go to
[28:24] (1704.44s)
audience Q&A let's see how many we can
[28:26] (1706.64s)
bang out yeah so actually yeah for these
[28:27] (1707.88s)
Maybe my my preference or my opinion
[28:30] (1710.08s)
would be let's focus on throughput
[28:31] (1711.52s)
rather than depth so maybe just one
[28:33] (1713.52s)
maybe two of us can answer okay so the
[28:35] (1715.00s)
first one here is highly voted how do
[28:37] (1717.24s)
you compete with employees who are in
[28:38] (1718.92s)
proximity to the manager versus those
[28:41] (1721.28s)
who might be full-time remote or hybrid
[28:43] (1723.60s)
and they don't have as much FaceTime or
[28:45] (1725.12s)
interaction with the manager Al go big
[28:47] (1727.60s)
thing there is just documentation
[28:49] (1729.40s)
communication make sure that you have
[28:51] (1731.96s)
proof right proof is going to be the big
[28:54] (1734.24s)
thing of I would say that's going to be
[28:55] (1735.40s)
the number one thing there and and I
[28:56] (1736.88s)
haven't really worked on a hybrid
[28:58] (1738.20s)
environment I've only really worked in a
[28:59] (1739.44s)
full remote environment but I think
[29:01] (1741.12s)
that's going to be your biggest way to
[29:02] (1742.64s)
to get leverag here I like it was asking
[29:05] (1745.44s)
about the appropriate number of hours so
[29:07] (1747.16s)
I'm curious for each of you this some
[29:09] (1749.08s)
meaningful project that you worked on to
[29:10] (1750.52s)
get to staff do you feel like you had to
[29:13] (1753.44s)
put in an abnormally higher number of
[29:16] (1756.24s)
hours to get that promotion mine was
[29:18] (1758.60s)
more than 40 hours a week I'll say that
[29:21] (1761.20s)
yeah same same like for me I was
[29:23] (1763.20s)
probably working like 50 55 and at
[29:25] (1765.76s)
Netflix when I was building out that
[29:26] (1766.92s)
graph database I was grinding for sure
[29:30] (1770.16s)
yep yeah same I would say somewhere 50
[29:32] (1772.76s)
to 60 always got my sleep but I was
[29:35] (1775.32s)
working most of my week or most of all
[29:37] (1777.32s)
of my weekdays that being said I've seen
[29:39] (1779.48s)
people get promoted working 40 as well
[29:42] (1782.48s)
but I was just down to grind so that's
[29:44] (1784.64s)
what I did I guess as an outlier I don't
[29:48] (1788.76s)
I did not when I got that promotion as a
[29:50] (1790.52s)
manager work more than 40 hours a week I
[29:53] (1793.48s)
had earlier in my career as an engineer
[29:55] (1795.92s)
worked a lot more than that a lot of
[29:58] (1798.44s)
that has to do with what you're doing
[30:01] (1801.72s)
and where the time is going and it may
[30:04] (1804.68s)
be the case that to deliver something it
[30:06] (1806.84s)
is going to require more time if you're
[30:09] (1809.20s)
working on something here's my
[30:11] (1811.28s)
perspective I worked on Force multiply a
[30:14] (1814.20s)
lot more than on individual delivery and
[30:17] (1817.08s)
it's not to say other people were like
[30:18] (1818.40s)
doing it wrong not at all but like the
[30:21] (1821.48s)
people side can show that impact in less
[30:26] (1826.72s)
hours spent so if you can make people
[30:30] (1830.04s)
super super effective then your the
[30:33] (1833.16s)
number of hours you work might not have
[30:36] (1836.04s)
the same correlation to impact as when
[30:38] (1838.12s)
you are delivering something yourself
[30:39] (1839.68s)
that's super impactful that's it yeah I
[30:42] (1842.04s)
guess if we're going around the circle
[30:42] (1842.92s)
I'll say that yeah I the way I viewed it
[30:44] (1844.96s)
is I never viewed it as okay this week
[30:46] (1846.28s)
I'm working 50 hours I've never thought
[30:47] (1847.72s)
of my work that way I've always started
[30:49] (1849.48s)
with okay what do I want to get done
[30:51] (1851.52s)
this week and yeah very frequently the
[30:54] (1854.40s)
amount of time I would need to dedicate
[30:55] (1855.92s)
to get that done would be more than 40
[30:57] (1857.60s)
it' be like 60 but then the following it
[30:59] (1859.28s)
could be like 30 so I I view my job less
[31:01] (1861.76s)
as here's the number of hours I'm
[31:02] (1862.92s)
working and much more about what is the
[31:06] (1866.40s)
goal of what I'm trying to do rugu has a
[31:09] (1869.08s)
highly voted question titles outside of
[31:11] (1871.32s)
big Tech are generally inflated so you
[31:13] (1873.32s)
might be a principal or senior principal
[31:15] (1875.28s)
or distinguished engineer at a startup
[31:17] (1877.28s)
but then you get down leveled when you
[31:18] (1878.40s)
go into meta or Google what should these
[31:21] (1881.36s)
people do in terms of in terms of work
[31:24] (1884.48s)
or impact to avoid being down leveled
[31:26] (1886.44s)
when they interview at fank getting
[31:28] (1888.64s)
downlevel it's because you're not at the
[31:30] (1890.24s)
level they expect you to be I don't
[31:31] (1891.76s)
really it sucks but that's the truth you
[31:34] (1894.36s)
can't avoid it unless you just are
[31:36] (1896.44s)
better or interview better sounds me but
[31:38] (1898.92s)
that's just the truth like a lot of
[31:40] (1900.56s)
times they're inflated because they have
[31:43] (1903.04s)
to do that like it Banks your vice
[31:45] (1905.32s)
president at like mid-level engineering
[31:47] (1907.52s)
sometimes it just happens so I wouldn't
[31:50] (1910.36s)
focus on that I would focus on looking
[31:53] (1913.60s)
at what those jobs mean at those
[31:55] (1915.24s)
companies and like maybe you're working
[31:58] (1918.56s)
as a principal engineer but that's
[32:00] (1920.08s)
senior engineer work at these companies
[32:02] (1922.08s)
or senior engineer scope at these
[32:03] (1923.76s)
companies so you're not getting down
[32:05] (1925.56s)
levels you're getting leveled
[32:07] (1927.36s)
correctly those companies but you need
[32:09] (1929.68s)
to know what is the right thing to
[32:11] (1931.28s)
Target don't just Target L5 and you know
[32:14] (1934.56s)
that are mid-level and hope that they
[32:16] (1936.88s)
like see how brilliant you are and
[32:18] (1938.32s)
instead give you an offer for a senior
[32:20] (1940.92s)
but don't think that it's like a down
[32:23] (1943.20s)
level because your title changed y
[32:25] (1945.76s)
especially when you're taking the step
[32:27] (1947.12s)
from these outside companies into big
[32:29] (1949.64s)
tech companies if you're getting paid
[32:31] (1951.44s)
three times as much and your title is
[32:33] (1953.16s)
two steps lower what the [ __ ] do you
[32:35] (1955.04s)
care like you are getting paid just like
[32:39] (1959.44s)
if you are doing meaningful work at the
[32:42] (1962.16s)
level that you are capable of like the
[32:45] (1965.60s)
title what it doesn't I yeah that's what
[32:48] (1968.20s)
happened for me I know I was a mid-level
[32:49] (1969.96s)
engineer at a startup and then when I
[32:51] (1971.72s)
got the job at Facebook I got a junior
[32:54] (1974.12s)
role at Facebook so I'm from mid-level
[32:56] (1976.12s)
to Junior but it was like an 80% bump in
[32:59] (1979.28s)
pay so I was like okay sure I'll go down
[33:02] (1982.36s)
the ladder for 80% more money yeah I'm
[33:05] (1985.00s)
down yeah and also about the yeah the
[33:08] (1988.16s)
levels are arbitrary but if you see the
[33:11] (1991.44s)
scope of what you're doing and you
[33:12] (1992.96s)
compare that to the scope of what these
[33:15] (1995.12s)
other companies expect at those levels
[33:17] (1997.20s)
you can see there's some mapping of okay
[33:20] (2000.04s)
I'm leading a small team and I'm called
[33:21] (2001.64s)
a vice president maybe that's a senior
[33:23] (2003.92s)
engineer at Fang and so you can think
[33:25] (2005.72s)
more about the work itself rather than
[33:27] (2007.52s)
just the titles all right what do you
[33:29] (2009.88s)
all think do we have time for one more
[33:31] (2011.20s)
before before we do like closing
[33:34] (2014.56s)
remarks yeah let go for it let's go for
[33:36] (2016.52s)
it all righten asked a long time ago um
[33:39] (2019.76s)
seniority also open up more
[33:41] (2021.88s)
opportunity like more ability to work on
[33:44] (2024.72s)
interesting projects or with cool people
[33:47] (2027.16s)
and so in that case it's a chicken and
[33:48] (2028.52s)
egg problem right where you can't get
[33:49] (2029.92s)
promoted until you have big enough
[33:51] (2031.56s)
projects but you don't get big enough
[33:52] (2032.68s)
projects until you get promoted so any
[33:55] (2035.64s)
commentary on that yeah I would say that
[33:59] (2039.88s)
to some extent yes it does help to have
[34:03] (2043.00s)
seniority but I guess seniority doesn't
[34:05] (2045.80s)
matter as much as your internal brand so
[34:08] (2048.20s)
if you're someone who's known to get big
[34:11] (2051.28s)
things done and your manager your
[34:14] (2054.08s)
director or your senior manager they
[34:16] (2056.24s)
have some big problem think about who
[34:18] (2058.88s)
they're thinking to give that problem if
[34:21] (2061.12s)
you're the first person that comes to
[34:22] (2062.52s)
mind that's where you want to be and
[34:24] (2064.60s)
your level often correlates so if you're
[34:27] (2067.44s)
already already by senior person you're
[34:29] (2069.88s)
probably getting things done and your
[34:31] (2071.40s)
manager trusts you to solve that problem
[34:34] (2074.72s)
so you are have more opportunities as a
[34:37] (2077.48s)
result but also if you have great
[34:39] (2079.80s)
visibility you're someone who is well
[34:42] (2082.16s)
known internally and you're a rising
[34:44] (2084.20s)
person that solves these big problems
[34:46] (2086.76s)
you can still get those problems as well
[34:48] (2088.52s)
so the commonality is being visible
[34:50] (2090.56s)
being known as someone who can get
[34:52] (2092.08s)
things done will give you more
[34:54] (2094.52s)
opportunities I will say title is a way
[34:57] (2097.32s)
to get doors to open it is not the only
[34:59] (2099.48s)
way to get doors to open so it is very
[35:02] (2102.32s)
similar to what Ryan said yes you might
[35:04] (2104.44s)
be trusted with a larger project based
[35:07] (2107.20s)
solely on title some places if you like
[35:09] (2109.96s)
just got there and you're brand new but
[35:11] (2111.40s)
you were hired into a role at a certain
[35:13] (2113.16s)
level but you can be someone that you
[35:16] (2116.60s)
know is a mid-level engineer but be
[35:18] (2118.76s)
given really high scope because you have
[35:22] (2122.72s)
a manager that has convinced people of
[35:24] (2124.84s)
this your own actions have already
[35:26] (2126.84s)
convinced people of and you have that
[35:28] (2128.48s)
trust you have a sponsor that is a like
[35:31] (2131.20s)
director level person that thinks you
[35:32] (2132.92s)
should take something on like you
[35:36] (2136.20s)
essentially you're going to have to find
[35:38] (2138.20s)
that scope and get those doors to open
[35:41] (2141.12s)
it's not just title title can help okay
[35:45] (2145.08s)
beautiful so in case people might need
[35:47] (2147.00s)
to drop off right at 11: California time
[35:50] (2150.36s)
then I I thought we could maybe do
[35:51] (2151.40s)
closing remarks I I might stick around
[35:52] (2152.92s)
for a few minutes after and just help
[35:54] (2154.80s)
out answer so if any of you four want to
[35:56] (2156.56s)
stick around with me would love that but
[35:58] (2158.92s)
before we go back to answering questions
[36:00] (2160.68s)
why don't we go around just say hey like
[36:02] (2162.88s)
maybe give them a pointer to where you
[36:04] (2164.40s)
want people to follow you or any call to
[36:06] (2166.36s)
action so Zach do you want to go first
[36:08] (2168.64s)
yeah for surey hey everyone I teach a
[36:10] (2170.36s)
lot of stuff about data engineering data
[36:11] (2171.96s)
science all that stuff so if you go to
[36:13] (2173.12s)
data expert.i you can make a free
[36:15] (2175.36s)
account there there's a lot of free
[36:16] (2176.64s)
stuff there and actually I just built
[36:18] (2178.00s)
out a SQL leite code project so data
[36:19] (2179.92s)
engineer. backquestions there's 50
[36:22] (2182.28s)
questions there a lot of those SQL
[36:23] (2183.68s)
questions are really hard and they're
[36:25] (2185.52s)
free to try right now very difficult but
[36:27] (2187.60s)
definitely I'd love feedback on all of
[36:29] (2189.48s)
that I'll pass it to Ryan yeah you so
[36:32] (2192.76s)
for where to find me you can find me on
[36:34] (2194.60s)
LinkedIn I also write on substack if you
[36:37] (2197.16s)
thought this content was interesting or
[36:40] (2200.00s)
relevant to you that's basically
[36:41] (2201.32s)
everything I write about I try to write
[36:43] (2203.12s)
about career progression to staff
[36:45] (2205.12s)
hopefully it's helpful for you and you
[36:46] (2206.64s)
can just check LinkedIn and then most of
[36:49] (2209.08s)
my stuff's there I second I second that
[36:51] (2211.88s)
his is the developing Dev really good
[36:54] (2214.56s)
it's really good like exactly I pass it
[36:58] (2218.64s)
yeah so roll linked put our LinkedIn
[37:01] (2221.04s)
links in there that's probably the best
[37:02] (2222.40s)
starting point I also write on substack
[37:05] (2225.08s)
because I write a lot of words I'm not
[37:08] (2228.08s)
very concise so substack doesn't have
[37:10] (2230.16s)
the same limits but I also do find that
[37:12] (2232.84s)
it it is a better place to be able to
[37:14] (2234.56s)
find things later and Link out and
[37:16] (2236.36s)
whatever you can start at the LinkedIn
[37:17] (2237.84s)
but substack I write about a lot of like
[37:20] (2240.96s)
Tech Career things I also write about a
[37:22] (2242.96s)
lot of mental health things I'm an
[37:24] (2244.68s)
autistic person I have ADHD that makes
[37:28] (2248.20s)
some things hard and some things easier
[37:30] (2250.32s)
but like I I write a lot about keeping
[37:32] (2252.68s)
your mental health up or mine not being
[37:35] (2255.20s)
kept up and what I'm trying to do about
[37:36] (2256.64s)
it and stuff like that as well yeah I'm
[37:39] (2259.32s)
supposed to pass it off Carly I will say
[37:41] (2261.48s)
Lee is awesome to follow for uh general
[37:44] (2264.68s)
advice and just like awesome
[37:46] (2266.44s)
vulnerability so I think that your
[37:48] (2268.40s)
content's amazingly and I feel like Zach
[37:50] (2270.84s)
really paved the way there on talking
[37:52] (2272.64s)
about Mental Health on LinkedIn and got
[37:55] (2275.24s)
so much flak for it on Reddit Jes like
[37:57] (2277.92s)
you triggered those nerds LinkedIn
[37:59] (2279.68s)
lunatic bro I also write a lot on
[38:01] (2281.48s)
LinkedIn and on substack I [ __ ] post a
[38:04] (2284.00s)
lot on Instagram so if you guys are into
[38:06] (2286.32s)
that I used to write a lot more about
[38:08] (2288.04s)
career stuff but I think that people
[38:10] (2290.36s)
like Ryan are taking the Baton from me
[38:12] (2292.04s)
and doing a much better job and more
[38:13] (2293.56s)
thoughtful job so I try to keep levity
[38:16] (2296.60s)
on LinkedIn because I feel like it gets
[38:18] (2298.24s)
too serious sometimes so if you like
[38:19] (2299.84s)
jokes about Linux and other random stuff
[38:21] (2301.68s)
that's where I've pivoted to so okay
[38:24] (2304.20s)
amazing and then IO LinkedIn I
[38:26] (2306.84s)
definitely post a as well similar to
[38:29] (2309.36s)
everyone here and then the two things I
[38:32] (2312.00s)
want to show are number one my YouTube
[38:33] (2313.84s)
channel I that's why the platform I
[38:35] (2315.52s)
spend the most time on and then the
[38:37] (2317.08s)
second thing I want to just mention is
[38:38] (2318.44s)
that later today we have an event which
[38:40] (2320.12s)
is a case study of another person aside
[38:43] (2323.96s)
from Ryan Ryan is probably the most
[38:45] (2325.48s)
famous person who went from E3 to E6 in
[38:47] (2327.76s)
three years we found someone else and
[38:50] (2330.76s)
that person's giving a talk later today
[38:52] (2332.96s)
so I wanted to put those two links in
[38:55] (2335.04s)
the chat and and I care about this topic
[38:57] (2337.72s)
a lot I actually teach a course
[38:59] (2339.16s)
literally called senior to staff it's
[39:01] (2341.20s)
not going on right now but at some point
[39:03] (2343.28s)
I'll open it up again but yeah I just
[39:04] (2344.44s)
feel like this is something I think
[39:05] (2345.76s)
about a lot and I care about a lot so I
[39:07] (2347.88s)
appreciate all of you attending and I
[39:10] (2350.76s)
appreciate all four of the other
[39:12] (2352.40s)
panelists to be very thoughtful and and
[39:14] (2354.64s)
taking some time out of their day
[39:16] (2356.36s)
whoever needs to drop I'm going to hang
[39:17] (2357.92s)
out for a little bit too so we we'll see
[39:20] (2360.20s)
what we can get through before everyone
[39:21] (2361.96s)
gets tired of it and have meetings
[39:24] (2364.76s)
manager life is meetings endless see
[39:26] (2366.96s)
y'all later
[39:28] (2368.12s)
y I have a meeting also but thanks
[39:30] (2370.12s)
everyone hope you like the event thanks
[39:33] (2373.08s)
for for
[39:34] (2374.44s)
hosting got three of us for a little
[39:36] (2376.44s)
while longer let's see what we so
[39:37] (2377.76s)
there's one on here from Beast Mond
[39:40] (2380.12s)
talking about visibility and promoting
[39:42] (2382.44s)
yourself I will say this feels dirty
[39:46] (2386.44s)
sometimes or it feels bad or you some
[39:48] (2388.48s)
people are like more naturally shy or
[39:50] (2390.92s)
they are a little more reserved how you
[39:53] (2393.32s)
get that visibility can vary you have to
[39:55] (2395.80s)
have it to move up period people have to
[39:58] (2398.40s)
see people in positions that can speak
[40:01] (2401.12s)
on your behalf have to know what you're
[40:02] (2402.56s)
doing and support you but it doesn't
[40:04] (2404.76s)
mean that you have to every time you do
[40:07] (2407.00s)
an interesting thing post about it on a
[40:09] (2409.44s)
message board or in slack or something
[40:11] (2411.64s)
but it might be in the form of you do
[40:14] (2414.56s)
Tech talks after a major is shipped or
[40:17] (2417.88s)
you run the tech talk series and get
[40:20] (2420.20s)
other people to be showing up so you're
[40:21] (2421.64s)
doing that in a meta way it could be
[40:23] (2423.88s)
that you everyone knows who you are
[40:26] (2426.24s)
because you answer the questions on the
[40:28] (2428.56s)
internal stack Overflow or whatever it
[40:30] (2430.60s)
is there are lots of ways it does not
[40:33] (2433.04s)
have something that you're uncomfortable
[40:34] (2434.76s)
doing to like self-promote but you must
[40:37] (2437.84s)
be visible yeah and I I think like
[40:40] (2440.32s)
visibility as well is also from building
[40:42] (2442.80s)
an internal brand is do your teammates
[40:44] (2444.72s)
feel comfortable asking you questions
[40:46] (2446.12s)
are you approachable are you someone who
[40:47] (2447.88s)
like you can help unblock people because
[40:50] (2450.92s)
like when you go to get promoted like
[40:52] (2452.88s)
you have to have all that peer feedback
[40:54] (2454.96s)
right so can you have three can you do
[40:56] (2456.80s)
can you have at least three or four
[40:58] (2458.08s)
co-workers who are like yeah this guy's
[41:00] (2460.40s)
awesome and can you like and that they
[41:02] (2462.56s)
can that you can actually they can
[41:04] (2464.52s)
actually vouge for you that's if you can
[41:06] (2466.52s)
cross disciplines with that it goes even
[41:09] (2469.08s)
further if you can be a person that
[41:11] (2471.48s)
product managers are like yeah they ask
[41:13] (2473.00s)
the best questions and they get things
[41:14] (2474.80s)
done cool if the data scientists are
[41:17] (2477.12s)
like yeah they make sure to instrument
[41:19] (2479.12s)
things so we can always figure out what
[41:20] (2480.88s)
happened like the more people in
[41:23] (2483.04s)
different places the better because if
[41:25] (2485.28s)
you're just like oh Engineers love him
[41:26] (2486.96s)
but product managers hate them you're
[41:28] (2488.44s)
still not moving up okay so Ain asked
[41:32] (2492.00s)
very early on and we just never got back
[41:34] (2494.44s)
to it what is the main inflection point
[41:36] (2496.56s)
for you when you decided to seek uh
[41:39] (2499.56s)
promotion and then also was it the money
[41:43] (2503.28s)
was it the title was it better work life
[41:45] (2505.64s)
balance that you thought you might get
[41:47] (2507.68s)
moving up so I will say for me I wanted
[41:52] (2512.36s)
to do a certain kind of work and that
[41:55] (2515.52s)
was something that I saw that people
[41:57] (2517.76s)
with higher titles that people in senior
[42:00] (2520.28s)
engineering roles principal engineering
[42:01] (2521.96s)
roles at Amazon were getting to do that
[42:04] (2524.24s)
I wanted to do and I did just start
[42:06] (2526.52s)
doing them but it was also like one of
[42:09] (2529.28s)
the main reasons I wanted to move up and
[42:10] (2530.76s)
a lot of that work was like influencing
[42:12] (2532.88s)
people on the management side that were
[42:15] (2535.56s)
higher up like being able to get the
[42:17] (2537.88s)
feel from other engineers and then
[42:19] (2539.48s)
influence and make things better for
[42:21] (2541.04s)
them it was mentoring people and being
[42:23] (2543.76s)
able to do that effectively and
[42:25] (2545.80s)
understand what it actually takes get
[42:27] (2547.52s)
there and if I haven't done it myself
[42:29] (2549.16s)
how am I going to tell them how to get
[42:30] (2550.36s)
to senior if I can't get to senior or
[42:32] (2552.48s)
whatever so that was the main thing for
[42:34] (2554.72s)
me but yeah of course I like getting
[42:36] (2556.40s)
paid like that's cool but it was a lot
[42:39] (2559.48s)
about the kind of work I wanted to do
[42:42] (2562.00s)
yeah two two things I want to call out
[42:43] (2563.44s)
here one first of all Erin sorry I
[42:44] (2564.80s)
missed it I'm glad you're still here so
[42:46] (2566.96s)
two things that came to mind for me
[42:48] (2568.40s)
about what I the reason I wanted staff
[42:50] (2570.44s)
yeah first of all money is good money is
[42:52] (2572.20s)
nice and the thing is that when you get
[42:54] (2574.60s)
promoted in big Tech at least your
[42:57] (2577.76s)
compensation doesn't go up linearly it
[42:59] (2579.24s)
goes up
[43:00] (2580.16s)
geometrically in the sense that you're
[43:01] (2581.84s)
not it's not like you get paid
[43:03] (2583.40s)
$220,000 uh from going to entry level to
[43:05] (2585.68s)
mid level and then 20K more from mid
[43:07] (2587.60s)
level to senior you probably get paid
[43:09] (2589.04s)
like 50k more mid level to senior and
[43:11] (2591.00s)
going from senior to staff you probably
[43:12] (2592.12s)
get paid like 100 or 200k more right so
[43:15] (2595.00s)
there's a substantial difference in the
[43:16] (2596.88s)
amount of total compensation you receive
[43:19] (2599.04s)
by getting to staff and I think money is
[43:21] (2601.76s)
optionality and I like that and that
[43:24] (2604.16s)
curve also changes based on the growth
[43:25] (2605.96s)
of the company so so a lot of times your
[43:28] (2608.08s)
mix of compensation moves more towards
[43:30] (2610.16s)
stock when you are getting to these
[43:32] (2612.52s)
higher levels and so yes it can be that
[43:35] (2615.80s)
they're targeting to pay you 150k more
[43:39] (2619.40s)
but then if the company's stock also
[43:41] (2621.60s)
doubles now you're making like 600k more
[43:44] (2624.72s)
having moved up and moved a lot of your
[43:46] (2626.76s)
compensation towards rsus or other
[43:49] (2629.28s)
stock-based comp so that's another thing
[43:52] (2632.20s)
that like it opens up growth with the
[43:54] (2634.56s)
company but that also comes with risk
[43:56] (2636.40s)
because yeah want to add to that though
[43:58] (2638.08s)
that does come with a lot of risk cuz I
[44:00] (2640.00s)
actually had the opposite experience cuz
[44:01] (2641.96s)
when I signed at Airbnb I got a stock my
[44:05] (2645.08s)
grant was like 1.5 million over four
[44:07] (2647.60s)
years and but that was at when the share
[44:09] (2649.48s)
price was at 210 and then when I was
[44:12] (2652.04s)
there in 6 months it went from 210 to 80
[44:15] (2655.20s)
so my $1.5 million went to like 600k and
[44:18] (2658.60s)
I'm like damn I'm like yeah I didn't
[44:20] (2660.44s)
know I didn't know a man could lose so
[44:21] (2661.92s)
much money in six months but and it just
[44:24] (2664.16s)
varies while I was at Amazon I was there
[44:26] (2666.36s)
from 2012 to 2021 or something in the
[44:29] (2669.28s)
stock oh yeah that's up and to the right
[44:33] (2673.00s)
that's just amazing but like at Google
[44:35] (2675.32s)
like the stock is about back to where my
[44:37] (2677.52s)
grant was I don't know it's not always
[44:39] (2679.88s)
that I'm just saying that is a another
[44:42] (2682.40s)
thing that changes yeah and well one
[44:45] (2685.00s)
more thing I wanted to add and this
[44:46] (2686.64s)
might sound maybe Politically Incorrect
[44:49] (2689.16s)
or not so good to think about but
[44:51] (2691.68s)
pedigree matters I I don't care how much
[44:53] (2693.92s)
people talk about oh Tech ism is Merit
[44:56] (2696.56s)
based pedigree and like name brand
[44:59] (2699.28s)
matters a ton because I think
[45:02] (2702.20s)
fundamentally humans are we we just do
[45:05] (2705.00s)
pattern matching and in some ways that's
[45:07] (2707.60s)
good in some ways it's bad right like it
[45:09] (2709.36s)
could it could be held against you if
[45:10] (2710.96s)
people have pattern matches on like race
[45:12] (2712.68s)
or gender that's obviously bad but there
[45:15] (2715.36s)
is also maybe the the flip side which is
[45:18] (2718.04s)
hey you worked at meta or Google and
[45:20] (2720.40s)
you're a staff engineer at Google most
[45:22] (2722.76s)
of other staff engineers at Google are
[45:24] (2724.32s)
pretty good and so from pattern matching
[45:27] (2727.16s)
I assume you're pretty good and so I
[45:29] (2729.16s)
really wanted to be able to effectively
[45:31] (2731.44s)
set a floor on my next job or on my
[45:34] (2734.56s)
startup to say hey I am an ex meta staff
[45:37] (2737.52s)
engineer and you can call that ego you
[45:39] (2739.80s)
can call that whatever you want but that
[45:41] (2741.76s)
did matter to me and I think it should
[45:43] (2743.44s)
matter to anyone who really thinks about
[45:46] (2746.36s)
career progression and job hopping okay
[45:49] (2749.12s)
I'm gonna answer one from Ram that just
[45:51] (2751.60s)
whatever is easy to answer what is the
[45:53] (2753.04s)
average team size for a staff engineer I
[45:55] (2755.20s)
don't think about it as team size I
[45:57] (2757.12s)
think about the number of people you
[45:58] (2758.68s)
impact because you should be impacting
[46:00] (2760.64s)
across teams unless you're like working
[46:02] (2762.72s)
for a director then maybe you're
[46:03] (2763.96s)
impacting the director's or or whatever
[46:06] (2766.20s)
but I would say that like for a senior
[46:08] (2768.76s)
engineer you should be at least
[46:10] (2770.00s)
affecting like yourself and a senior
[46:11] (2771.96s)
manager's scope so if you work for a
[46:14] (2774.32s)
line manager but they report to a senior
[46:16] (2776.08s)
manager hit that other senior manager's
[46:18] (2778.44s)
teams too it's normally like 20 to 30
[46:21] (2781.28s)
Engineers probably at staff it's
[46:23] (2783.64s)
probably up to 50 to 60 or more more at
[46:27] (2787.76s)
principal or the next step up it's
[46:29] (2789.44s)
probably in the hundreds you're probably
[46:31] (2791.08s)
affecting like a vp's org so that that
[46:33] (2793.92s)
roughly if Zack or R you want to talk
[46:36] (2796.28s)
something like when I was at Airbnb and
[46:38] (2798.00s)
I was on like Marketplace because I was
[46:39] (2799.96s)
on more like narrowly focusing on
[46:41] (2801.72s)
pricing and availability but there's all
[46:43] (2803.20s)
the other Marketplace Dynamic stuff and
[46:44] (2804.84s)
that whole org was like 75 engineers and
[46:47] (2807.84s)
I was impacting like the data in that
[46:49] (2809.56s)
org but I was also not like the only
[46:51] (2811.64s)
staff engineer I think there was like
[46:53] (2813.04s)
five there's like Airbnb also leans very
[46:56] (2816.08s)
heavy in the staff engineer if you look
[46:57] (2817.68s)
at their job board right now they have
[46:59] (2819.44s)
35 Staff positions open and that's it
[47:02] (2822.92s)
that's that's it that's the only people
[47:04] (2824.40s)
they're hiring right now it's just so
[47:06] (2826.12s)
ridiculous like cool so the last one
[47:08] (2828.92s)
maybe I saw and now it's so hard to
[47:11] (2831.24s)
scroll in this chat oh my God I'm sorry
[47:13] (2833.96s)
I don't know who it was but it was
[47:15] (2835.32s)
asking about politics and how that
[47:17] (2837.72s)
affects things and whatever
[47:19] (2839.80s)
relationships matter people matter you
[47:22] (2842.64s)
can call it politics if you want but
[47:24] (2844.56s)
it's all people there are people that
[47:26] (2846.96s)
are jerks and you have to play nice with
[47:29] (2849.44s)
them to move up there are people that
[47:31] (2851.60s)
are backstabbing and they are using
[47:33] (2853.52s)
politics in the negative way to move up
[47:36] (2856.04s)
you probably aren't going to change that
[47:38] (2858.08s)
or get them fired or bring them down you
[47:40] (2860.36s)
need to bring yourself up when you're
[47:42] (2862.36s)
talking about politics what kind is it
[47:45] (2865.72s)
if it's really toxic maybe it's just not
[47:48] (2868.00s)
the right place but otherwise a lot of
[47:50] (2870.52s)
times when people say politics what they
[47:52] (2872.16s)
mean is I can't communicate very clearly
[47:55] (2875.20s)
with people in executive roles or I
[47:57] (2877.44s)
don't get along well with this other
[47:59] (2879.00s)
team or whatever and you just have to
[48:00] (2880.96s)
fix that you have to be able to do that
[48:03] (2883.28s)
and you also whomever ask sorry asked
[48:05] (2885.92s)
about NE
[48:07] (2887.00s)
neurodiversity absolutely I am autistic
[48:10] (2890.40s)
I have ADHD I have depression I have
[48:12] (2892.16s)
anxiety it is hard I had to learn some
[48:15] (2895.04s)
lessons in a hard way I ran in
[48:18] (2898.36s)
eventually a manager was like Hey you
[48:21] (2901.16s)
are right with almost everything that
[48:23] (2903.76s)
you say but the way that you say it can
[48:26] (2906.04s)
be too blunt and people can't hear it so
[48:28] (2908.48s)
you need to find ways to be heard and be
[48:31] (2911.88s)
right not just be right and so it was
[48:34] (2914.04s)
like oh if you are just like no that
[48:36] (2916.12s)
will never work people might not listen
[48:37] (2917.84s)
to you but if you're like oh hey the
[48:39] (2919.52s)
last system that I worked on we tried to
[48:41] (2921.76s)
do it that way and it really fell apart
[48:44] (2924.20s)
so have you considered like when you hit
[48:46] (2926.84s)
this inflection point will your the
[48:48] (2928.32s)
system still stand up that's a much
[48:50] (2930.40s)
different way of saying it and people
[48:51] (2931.72s)
are going to be much more receptive I
[48:53] (2933.80s)
ask a lot of questions I make a lot
[48:55] (2935.64s)
fewer state hey have you thought about
[48:58] (2938.00s)
this hey what about that oh you know
[49:00] (2940.76s)
what I don't know if that's going to
[49:02] (2942.56s)
work did you prototype that asking those
[49:05] (2945.00s)
things is much different than your idea
[49:06] (2946.76s)
is terrible and it will never work even
[49:08] (2948.92s)
if you know that to be true you need to
[49:11] (2951.00s)
get it to be heard that's my general
[49:13] (2953.28s)
take I think like one of the highest
[49:14] (2954.64s)
measures of intelligence is not like
[49:16] (2956.56s)
what you say it's what questions you ask
[49:18] (2958.60s)
that's like a life thing too not just an
[49:20] (2960.08s)
engineering thing yeah okay amazing for
[49:23] (2963.80s)
the 130 of you who stuck around 10
[49:25] (2965.92s)
minutes past the hour I really
[49:27] (2967.56s)
appreciate it Lee Zach thanks so much
[49:29] (2969.76s)
Zach I love the work you're doing in
[49:30] (2970.80s)
data engineer and Lee I love the
[49:32] (2972.92s)
consistency you have with writing so
[49:35] (2975.72s)
appreciate all of you awesome bye
[49:38] (2978.24s)
everyone see you all