[00:00] (0.16s)
These two models look nearly identical,
[00:02] (2.96s)
but one took twice the time to print and
[00:05] (5.04s)
wasted nearly a half a kilo of filament.
[00:07] (7.92s)
And the reason why? Well, it might just
[00:10] (10.08s)
explain why Bamboo's most expensive
[00:12] (12.16s)
enclosed printer is actually cheaper
[00:14] (14.48s)
than their cheapest if you print enough.
[00:17] (17.44s)
Today, we're doing the math. Time,
[00:19] (19.68s)
purge, cost, everything. By the end of
[00:22] (22.32s)
this video, you'll know exactly which of
[00:24] (24.16s)
these enclosed bamboo printers is right
[00:26] (26.00s)
for you. And hey, if you're not sold on
[00:28] (28.40s)
bamboo at all, stick around to the end
[00:30] (30.56s)
of the video because I'll recommend a
[00:32] (32.08s)
couple of alternatives that deliver
[00:33] (33.84s)
amazing results for the price. On paper,
[00:36] (36.72s)
both printers are Corxy and fully
[00:39] (39.04s)
enclosed, but this H2D is about $2,000
[00:43] (43.04s)
and the P1S is just about $4.99. Um,
[00:46] (46.16s)
that's a $1,500 difference. Now, these
[00:48] (48.24s)
prices are at the time of filming, of
[00:50] (50.56s)
course, so things could change. Both use
[00:52] (52.72s)
the exact same AMS type system for
[00:54] (54.96s)
multiolor. Both support Bamboo Studio
[00:57] (57.44s)
and both can be set up in under 20
[00:59] (59.52s)
minutes out of the box. The P1S feels
[01:01] (61.60s)
like it's more than just an entry CXY
[01:03] (63.68s)
machine from Bamboo. It's fast, compact,
[01:06] (66.40s)
and gets you printing multiolor reliably
[01:08] (68.64s)
without breaking the bank. The H2D
[01:11] (71.44s)
though feels different. It's quieter,
[01:14] (74.16s)
heavier, there's glass instead of
[01:16] (76.00s)
plastic, and it just looks and feels
[01:18] (78.08s)
like a machine that's built to run 24/7.
[01:21] (81.12s)
And visually, the H2D is stunning. those
[01:24] (84.72s)
flush glass viewing windows on both
[01:26] (86.48s)
sides, clean, minimal, elegant, making
[01:29] (89.52s)
it the best looking machine Bamboo has
[01:31] (91.68s)
released so far. In fact, they're
[01:34] (94.08s)
already being copied by other
[01:35] (95.52s)
manufacturers. The P1S was revolutionary
[01:37] (97.92s)
when it launched, and honestly, it still
[01:40] (100.24s)
holds up. But Bamboo managed to oneup
[01:42] (102.48s)
themselves again with the H2D's
[01:44] (104.56s)
aesthetic, especially in a studio
[01:46] (106.32s)
environment. It's beautiful to film. One
[01:48] (108.56s)
will do enough and more to get the job
[01:50] (110.48s)
done. the other. It's loaded with far
[01:52] (112.96s)
more features and conveniences and
[01:54] (114.72s)
really is the best 3D printer that
[01:56] (116.64s)
exists in our market. Now, in their most
[01:59] (119.28s)
basic form, they're both enclosed Corxy
[02:02] (122.00s)
printers from Bamboo, but they serve
[02:04] (124.32s)
very different types of users. With
[02:06] (126.88s)
that, let's test whether the price gap
[02:08] (128.96s)
holds up in real results. The single
[02:11] (131.28s)
biggest difference, the HTD has two
[02:13] (133.28s)
nozzles. That means significantly
[02:15] (135.20s)
reduced purge waste out of the back
[02:17] (137.20s)
depending on which nozzles or filaments
[02:19] (139.12s)
it is switching between. Think about it
[02:21] (141.04s)
this way. If two of the most common
[02:23] (143.28s)
colors are black and white on this
[02:25] (145.04s)
Stormtrooper, then one color can be
[02:27] (147.04s)
loaded in the left nozzle and the other
[02:28] (148.80s)
in the right nozzle, and it doesn't need
[02:30] (150.72s)
to purge waste. It just uses the Prime
[02:32] (152.96s)
tower to make sure the filament is
[02:34] (154.32s)
flowing between changes. And beyond
[02:36] (156.96s)
extrusion, this thing is a spec monster.
[02:40] (160.40s)
Larger build volume, chamber heater,
[02:42] (162.48s)
better internals, hardened hotend
[02:44] (164.48s)
assembly, sensors everywhere. If you're
[02:47] (167.28s)
thinking long term, the H2D might be the
[02:49] (169.68s)
most futurep proofed machine Bamboo has
[02:51] (171.92s)
ever released. But does the futurep
[02:54] (174.24s)
proof mean value? Let's see how these
[02:56] (176.88s)
two actually perform with the same print
[02:59] (179.68s)
>> Look, sir, droids. Let me see your
[03:01] (181.76s)
identification. These aren't the droids
[03:03] (183.60s)
we're looking for.
[03:04] (184.96s)
>> Hey, and if you found this video helpful
[03:06] (186.80s)
so far, hit that like and subscribe
[03:08] (188.80s)
button. We're a small channel. Helps us
[03:10] (190.48s)
out a lot. Both printers printed this
[03:12] (192.64s)
Chibi Stormtrooper from Chibi STL using
[03:15] (195.28s)
the Bamboo AMS and Polymaker Polyite PLA
[03:17] (197.92s)
Pro. Same filament, same color
[03:20] (200.08s)
assignments, same settings. Literally,
[03:22] (202.32s)
the only difference was the printer. Oh,
[03:24] (204.88s)
and a big thanks to Polymaker for
[03:26] (206.96s)
sponsoring this video. There are links
[03:29] (209.04s)
to this exact filament on the screen and
[03:31] (211.20s)
down in the description if you want to
[03:32] (212.56s)
go check them out. And if you want to
[03:33] (213.84s)
save 15% on your first order, use LM
[03:36] (216.24s)
show first try and I'll have that in the
[03:38] (218.48s)
description as well. The P1S took one
[03:40] (220.48s)
day, 17 hours, and swapped filament 799
[03:45] (225.28s)
times, purging each time. The H2D took
[03:49] (229.12s)
just 21 hours, and swapped filament only
[03:52] (232.80s)
once, and wasted only.16
[03:56] (236.96s)
of a gram. Ultimately, the dual nozzle
[04:00] (240.08s)
configuration of the H2D saved almost
[04:02] (242.56s)
500 g of filament from being wasted. One
[04:06] (246.24s)
of the benefits of the H2D is that it
[04:08] (248.64s)
can intelligently determine which colors
[04:10] (250.96s)
should be on which nozzles to maximize
[04:13] (253.36s)
efficiency, ultimately reducing both
[04:15] (255.52s)
filament waste and time. In this case,
[04:18] (258.32s)
it determined that white should be on
[04:20] (260.32s)
the external spool holder. That's the
[04:22] (262.16s)
left nozzle. And for the right nozzle,
[04:24] (264.32s)
black should be in slot one on the AMS
[04:26] (266.40s)
and silver in slot two. But here's the
[04:29] (269.60s)
thing, the final prints, they're nearly
[04:32] (272.56s)
identical. And that says a lot. not
[04:34] (274.72s)
about the H2D, but about how good
[04:37] (277.52s)
Bamboo's entire lineup is. The P1S might
[04:40] (280.80s)
be the cheapest, but it's no slouch. So,
[04:44] (284.00s)
if both printers make stunning parts, is
[04:46] (286.48s)
the P1S actually the better deal? Now,
[04:48] (288.88s)
let's run the numbers. Future loyal
[04:51] (291.12s)
here. During the edit, I wanted to make
[04:53] (293.28s)
sure that I mentioned that neither of
[04:55] (295.04s)
these machines are perfect. So during
[04:58] (298.24s)
the initial setup of the Stormtrooper
[05:00] (300.32s)
prints on both the P1S actually had a
[05:03] (303.44s)
tangle in the AMS that it caused itself
[05:06] (306.24s)
and that that means that the printer
[05:07] (307.60s)
didn't even start for another 8 or 10
[05:09] (309.28s)
hours after we had left the studio for
[05:11] (311.20s)
the night into the next day. And the H2D
[05:14] (314.64s)
it uh had a spaghetti detection false
[05:17] (317.68s)
positive error during a Twitch live
[05:20] (320.32s)
stream where it thought it detected a
[05:22] (322.16s)
clogged purge shoot um when that really
[05:24] (324.64s)
wasn't an issue. Everything I said nice
[05:26] (326.88s)
about the Bamboo Lab H2D, I want you to
[05:29] (329.12s)
forget that
[05:31] (331.28s)
>> cuz it is angry and flashing red at us.
[05:33] (333.28s)
>> Flashing red. That's not a good sign.
[05:36] (336.80s)
>> Anybody know what it's saying?
[05:39] (339.52s)
Either of these machines, they're
[05:41] (341.20s)
they're mechanical. They will have
[05:42] (342.56s)
failures, but it's really not about
[05:44] (344.40s)
that. I would say I think it's more
[05:45] (345.84s)
important to focus on what these
[05:47] (347.92s)
machines get right and how often they
[05:49] (349.92s)
get it right. They're just tools and uh
[05:52] (352.64s)
these things can happen. All right, back
[05:54] (354.48s)
to the video. Let's break this down. I
[05:56] (356.88s)
saved every bit of purge from both of
[05:59] (359.12s)
these prints, and it's actually pretty
[06:01] (361.20s)
shocking. This is what the P1S wasted,
[06:07] (367.20s)
and this is what the H2D needed.
[06:11] (371.44s)
That's almost 500 g difference every
[06:15] (375.04s)
time you run a job like this. At roughly
[06:18] (378.16s)
$20 per kilo, that's about $9.40 in
[06:21] (381.60s)
waste per print. Multiply that by just
[06:24] (384.88s)
50 prints a year. That's 470 in lost
[06:28] (388.88s)
filament gone. And that's just the
[06:32] (392.08s)
material. Now, let's talk time. The P1S
[06:34] (394.88s)
took nearly twice as long to finish the
[06:37] (397.20s)
same print. 41 hours versus 21 on the
[06:40] (400.80s)
H2D. Even if your time isn't billable,
[06:43] (403.76s)
your machine's availability still
[06:46] (406.08s)
matters. And runtime matters, too. These
[06:48] (408.96s)
machines weren't designed to run
[06:50] (410.64s)
forever. failures are baked into them
[06:53] (413.20s)
and the longer that they run
[06:54] (414.56s)
continuously, the sooner you'll
[06:56] (416.72s)
experience one. So, let's do the math.
[06:59] (419.04s)
$1,500 divided by $9.40 per print equals
[07:03] (423.04s)
about $160 multiolor jobs. That's your
[07:06] (426.64s)
break even point just on wasted
[07:09] (429.52s)
material. If you print three or four
[07:11] (431.52s)
models in a week, you'll get there in a
[07:13] (433.92s)
year. But if you're only printing once a
[07:16] (436.40s)
month, the P1S starts to look like the
[07:18] (438.32s)
smarter choice. So, which one is the
[07:20] (440.48s)
better deal? Well, that depends. And
[07:23] (443.12s)
that's exactly why we need to talk about
[07:25] (445.12s)
who these printers are actually for. So,
[07:27] (447.84s)
now that we've seen how these machines
[07:29] (449.60s)
stack up, specs, print time, cost, let's
[07:32] (452.80s)
talk about who they're actually built
[07:34] (454.32s)
for. Because depending on what you need,
[07:36] (456.24s)
your answer might flip again. You can
[07:39] (459.12s)
see how this isn't about which printer
[07:41] (461.04s)
is better, but which one is better for
[07:43] (463.12s)
you. And even now, I still use each in
[07:45] (465.68s)
the studio for very different projects
[07:47] (467.84s)
all of the time. Let me know in the
[07:49] (469.68s)
comments which one you would pick. Are
[07:51] (471.52s)
you leaning towards the value with the
[07:53] (473.04s)
P1S or are you investing long-term with
[07:55] (475.60s)
the H2D? I'd love to hear what you're
[07:57] (477.76s)
thinking about. Let me give you my
[07:59] (479.44s)
personal take and maybe that'll help
[08:01] (481.44s)
settle this. I didn't expect this, but
[08:03] (483.76s)
after running the numbers, the H2D is
[08:06] (486.08s)
one of the few printers that could
[08:07] (487.60s)
actually pay for itself just from time
[08:10] (490.00s)
and filament savings. But let's zoom
[08:12] (492.48s)
out. The real cost of the printer isn't
[08:15] (495.44s)
just the machine. It's your time, your
[08:17] (497.68s)
materials, and how often you can trust
[08:19] (499.60s)
it to do the job while you're focused on
[08:21] (501.76s)
something else. The P1S, it punches so
[08:24] (504.80s)
far above its price point that it's
[08:26] (506.64s)
almost unfair. It gives you access to
[08:29] (509.36s)
the bamboo ecosystem, AMS multiolor
[08:32] (512.00s)
printing, and excellent print quality.
[08:34] (514.32s)
But the HDD pushes into another
[08:36] (516.64s)
category. It's quieter. It's larger.
[08:39] (519.36s)
It's smarter about how it handles
[08:40] (520.96s)
multiolor jobs. And honestly, it is the
[08:43] (523.28s)
nicest 3D printer that has ever shown up
[08:45] (525.60s)
here in the studio. From build quality
[08:48] (528.00s)
and print results to user experience, it
[08:50] (530.88s)
just cannot be beat right now. I've had
[08:53] (533.12s)
moments where the P1S struggled with
[08:54] (534.88s)
filament retractions on long jobs or
[08:56] (536.96s)
needed a calibration when something just
[08:59] (539.20s)
felt off with the results. Meanwhile,
[09:01] (541.84s)
this H2D just keeps going. Even with the
[09:04] (544.80s)
false spaghetti warning during the
[09:06] (546.56s)
Twitch live stream, it picked right back
[09:08] (548.48s)
up and finished the job beautifully. But
[09:11] (551.12s)
again, that's my use case, and yours
[09:13] (553.68s)
might be completely different. I'd
[09:15] (555.44s)
actually love to do a follow-up live
[09:16] (556.96s)
stream where we talk about the cost of
[09:18] (558.64s)
ownership, long-term, maintenance,
[09:20] (560.40s)
upgrades, and slicer settings, and even
[09:22] (562.64s)
real world tips. Um, if that sounds
[09:24] (564.64s)
helpful, drop a comment and uh we'll
[09:26] (566.80s)
make it happen. And while we're at it,
[09:28] (568.48s)
if you've got either of these machines,
[09:30] (570.48s)
let me know what your experience has
[09:31] (571.84s)
been. What did you love? What surprised
[09:34] (574.08s)
you? Or what would you change? During
[09:36] (576.16s)
one of our live Twitch streams, we asked
[09:38] (578.16s)
viewers which machine they'd buy if they
[09:40] (580.40s)
had the budget for either, and the
[09:42] (582.40s)
responses were split right down the
[09:44] (584.24s)
middle. Some folks valued print speed
[09:46] (586.56s)
and dual extrusion. Others said they'd
[09:48] (588.72s)
take the P1S and spend the difference on
[09:50] (590.96s)
filament or multiple P1S's. And
[09:53] (593.20s)
honestly, both answers are probably
[09:55] (595.84s)
right. Being able to purchase four P1S's
[09:59] (599.28s)
to a single H2D makes a huge difference
[10:02] (602.56s)
in your home print farm or a production
[10:04] (604.88s)
environment. You will still have the
[10:07] (607.20s)
waste if you're using the AMS often. But
[10:09] (609.60s)
if you don't and only print single
[10:11] (611.20s)
color, you'll have four times the
[10:13] (613.52s)
production capacity. And if you have a
[10:15] (615.60s)
complete machine failure or are down
[10:17] (617.52s)
waiting on parts, you'll still have
[10:19] (619.20s)
machines that are pumping out prints.
[10:21] (621.52s)
That's the cool thing about this space.
[10:23] (623.92s)
There isn't one perfect answer. It's
[10:27] (627.20s)
just what fits you best. So, H2D versus
[10:32] (632.00s)
P1S, $2,000 versus $4.99. Which is the
[10:35] (635.84s)
better printer? The truth is, both are
[10:38] (638.08s)
incredible. One is more accessible, the
[10:40] (640.00s)
other more advanced, but both give you
[10:42] (642.16s)
amazing results if you understand their
[10:44] (644.48s)
strengths. And like I promised earlier,
[10:46] (646.80s)
for those of you who aren't quite ready
[10:48] (648.56s)
to jump into the bamboo ecosystem, here
[10:51] (651.04s)
are two other printers that I highly
[10:53] (653.04s)
recommend. The Elgus Centuri Carbon and
[10:55] (655.52s)
the Any Cubic Cobra S1. Both offer
[10:58] (658.40s)
incredible value and performance and
[11:00] (660.24s)
I've made videos on each of those and
[11:02] (662.24s)
you should check them out. I'll have
[11:03] (663.36s)
links in the description. And to all of
[11:05] (665.44s)
our YouTube members and Patreon
[11:07] (667.12s)
supporters, thank you. You make this
[11:09] (669.76s)
possible and we couldn't do this without
[11:11] (671.36s)
you and I'm deeply grateful for your
[11:13] (673.20s)
support. I hope you enjoyed it. Thanks
[11:14] (674.96s)
for watching and I will see you in the
[11:17] (677.12s)
next one.