[00:00] (0.16s)
uh Perplexity CEO R Vince Reina Vas,
[00:02] (2.56s)
thank you so much for being here. I know
[00:03] (3.84s)
it has been an incredibly busy week
[00:05] (5.44s)
because it's been 5 days since you
[00:07] (7.52s)
launched this browser Comet. Um tell me
[00:10] (10.56s)
what the early feedback has been. I know
[00:12] (12.64s)
that the weight list spiked, but what
[00:14] (14.40s)
are you hearing from users from power
[00:17] (17.92s)
Um I would say way better than I
[00:20] (20.72s)
thought. Um it's a very new product. It
[00:23] (23.44s)
takes some uh learning to actually fully
[00:26] (26.32s)
utilize the power of it. um like like
[00:29] (29.12s)
the the mode of interaction where you're
[00:31] (31.04s)
just asking an AI to just go do things
[00:32] (32.88s)
for you and waiting for a bit to uh see
[00:37] (37.12s)
the task getting done is pretty new
[00:38] (38.96s)
because we're all used to just using
[00:40] (40.80s)
chat bots and they come back with
[00:42] (42.40s)
instant answers. Sometimes with these
[00:44] (44.00s)
reasoning models is a bit slow but uh
[00:46] (46.48s)
the amount of usage on like things like
[00:48] (48.24s)
deep research is still like pretty tiny
[00:50] (50.08s)
compared to the more dominant usage of
[00:52] (52.32s)
uh chat bots instantly responding to
[00:54] (54.00s)
you. uh the browser entirely changes uh
[00:57] (57.12s)
things from like you know chat
[00:58] (58.48s)
interactions to end to end workflows uh
[01:01] (61.12s)
and and so uh I was obviously expecting
[01:03] (63.44s)
not many people to instantly get it but
[01:05] (65.76s)
I've been very surprised by all the
[01:07] (67.76s)
creative ways people are using it
[01:09] (69.76s)
including like controlling like
[01:11] (71.20s)
electronics in their home or like having
[01:13] (73.44s)
it talk to their customer support agent
[01:15] (75.84s)
uh for like tracking some packages or
[01:18] (78.40s)
like uh unsubscribing a lot of spam
[01:20] (80.88s)
emails on their inbox or like uh
[01:23] (83.76s)
creating their own workflows and tasks
[01:25] (85.60s)
for getting updates on certain uh news
[01:27] (87.68s)
or stocks. Uh it's it's really amazing
[01:30] (90.16s)
to see how they're like utilizing it for
[01:32] (92.64s)
common like small business use cases. Uh
[01:35] (95.36s)
like you know comparing prices and
[01:37] (97.36s)
figuring out what to price the item that
[01:39] (99.60s)
they're selling on a Facebook
[01:40] (100.64s)
marketplace. Uh going and doing research
[01:42] (102.88s)
on social media to find what what are
[01:44] (104.80s)
people talking about a certain brand uh
[01:46] (106.88s)
and helping like like write their
[01:48] (108.40s)
marketing messages for that. So um we're
[01:51] (111.04s)
going to see like like our aspiration
[01:52] (112.88s)
honestly is like whatever claw code
[01:55] (115.36s)
which is truly like the first agentic
[01:57] (117.28s)
software engineer whatever that did for
[01:59] (119.92s)
coding like we kind of want to do it for
[02:02] (122.56s)
um any task that any business owner has
[02:05] (125.20s)
that has nothing to do with coding like
[02:06] (126.80s)
just day-to-day browsing and and and and
[02:09] (129.52s)
normal people too uh and and that's like
[02:11] (131.84s)
a much bigger market and uh that'll make
[02:14] (134.40s)
the browser feel like a true uh Swiss
[02:16] (136.72s)
Army knife for your digital life. Is
[02:19] (139.12s)
claude the one powering the browser?
[02:21] (141.36s)
Uh we use many models. It's not just
[02:23] (143.12s)
claude. Uh it's a mix of our own models
[02:25] (145.04s)
which are poster on top of DeepSeek and
[02:27] (147.20s)
then OpenAI's models and Anthropics
[02:29] (149.20s)
models.
[02:30] (150.88s)
What you said that there's been some use
[02:32] (152.88s)
cases that you didn't necessarily
[02:34] (154.24s)
anticipate. What's been a few of maybe
[02:35] (155.92s)
the most surprising ones?
[02:38] (158.32s)
Um I think like uh the the one that
[02:41] (161.84s)
where like they're just connecting comet
[02:44] (164.16s)
our our agent to um home devices uh was
[02:47] (167.52s)
was was pretty powerful. It's still very
[02:49] (169.76s)
new like like there was just it was a
[02:51] (171.20s)
mock demo of just you know um like like
[02:53] (173.92s)
letting it turn your color of your light
[02:55] (175.68s)
bulb at home based on the weather.
[02:57] (177.76s)
Uh you could imagine uh this all turning
[03:00] (180.56s)
into an OS, right? Like like o like like
[03:02] (182.88s)
it literally uh feels like u a moment
[03:05] (185.92s)
where the AI that has access to your
[03:08] (188.32s)
personal context and can control tabs
[03:10] (190.48s)
and can um you know access like other
[03:13] (193.20s)
APIs and tools uh makes intelligent
[03:16] (196.08s)
decisions based on what you want it to
[03:17] (197.68s)
do and can be run repetitively uh as
[03:20] (200.08s)
like a task. So if we build something
[03:22] (202.88s)
like a comet task manager um which has
[03:26] (206.00s)
like a bunch of background processes
[03:27] (207.44s)
running all the time on your client and
[03:29] (209.60s)
can interact with the server for
[03:31] (211.12s)
whatever data it needs to pull or
[03:33] (213.04s)
whatever data it has on the client uh
[03:35] (215.44s)
combine the two effectively and call
[03:37] (217.52s)
upon and harness the reasoning
[03:38] (218.88s)
capabilities of the most powerful
[03:40] (220.24s)
frontier models and apply it for your
[03:41] (221.92s)
day-to-day task. that feels like the
[03:44] (224.24s)
first real AI operating system and and
[03:46] (226.80s)
uh that's our vision for the future,
[03:48] (228.56s)
right? And I mean when you think about
[03:50] (230.08s)
like home automation, maybe you're on
[03:52] (232.40s)
the Amazon Echo Alexa platform or you're
[03:55] (235.20s)
on Google Home, but basically perplexity
[03:57] (237.84s)
has always been sort of agnostic. That's
[03:59] (239.44s)
been its strength, right? It can operate
[04:01] (241.20s)
across a bunch of different
[04:02] (242.16s)
Yeah, the memory is model agnostic. Uh
[04:04] (244.48s)
the the the behavior, the way the client
[04:06] (246.64s)
works is model agnostic. Um, so it's
[04:09] (249.20s)
it's it's operating at an abstraction
[04:11] (251.12s)
about like which model or like which
[04:13] (253.60s)
chatbot do you want to use. You have the
[04:15] (255.60s)
sidecar assistant with you all the time.
[04:17] (257.68s)
Uh, you can use it while you're on
[04:19] (259.04s)
YouTube, you're doing some research,
[04:20] (260.40s)
you're trying to like watch an interview
[04:21] (261.76s)
of some person to pull up some specific
[04:23] (263.84s)
things related to some topic that they
[04:25] (265.44s)
said and you want to bring it to your
[04:27] (267.04s)
interview like that's a use case for
[04:28] (268.56s)
you. Um, and and like
[04:30] (270.48s)
I use that today prepping for the SAR
[04:32] (272.24s)
event. So you know exactly
[04:33] (273.60s)
exactly. So uh I I there's no time for
[04:36] (276.40s)
anyone to watch like 1 hour or 2 hour uh
[04:38] (278.80s)
videos anymore. It's we're living in a
[04:40] (280.48s)
world where like time is in short
[04:42] (282.08s)
supply. So having the comet assistant
[04:44] (284.40s)
just able to do this high bandwidth
[04:46] (286.16s)
access to uh the entire transcript and
[04:48] (288.64s)
not just summarization right that's
[04:50] (290.16s)
that's just very basic things uh YouTube
[04:52] (292.80s)
can give you that but but real like fine
[04:54] (294.80s)
grain questions and then exporting your
[04:57] (297.12s)
answers into like your workflow not just
[04:59] (299.20s)
getting the answer in the sidecar but
[05:00] (300.64s)
actually like okay can can you just
[05:02] (302.16s)
format it in a certain way and uh just
[05:04] (304.40s)
email it to my uh producers of the show
[05:06] (306.40s)
to like have them add these notes to the
[05:08] (308.24s)
doc and and then just uh email it back
[05:10] (310.88s)
to me. uh that sort of like
[05:12] (312.56s)
collaboration. Um there's just so much
[05:14] (314.88s)
more opportunity there.
[05:16] (316.64s)
So here's how I sort of like to describe
[05:18] (318.16s)
it. I've been using it for about five
[05:19] (319.60s)
days as well. Um and just again sort of
[05:22] (322.16s)
just discovering what it's capable of.
[05:24] (324.96s)
But the assistant or the agentic part of
[05:26] (326.80s)
it has been really interesting. I like
[05:28] (328.00s)
to call it a browser that's not just
[05:29] (329.36s)
showing you the internet, but it's
[05:30] (330.72s)
trying to use the internet for you. I
[05:33] (333.04s)
had to approve a lot of access though to
[05:36] (336.40s)
do that because that's how it works
[05:38] (338.00s)
best, right? Um, and I think for maybe
[05:41] (341.04s)
the more mainstream user, um, what
[05:44] (344.08s)
assurances can you give them that that
[05:45] (345.76s)
data is going to be protected and that
[05:47] (347.44s)
the more you give it, the more useful
[05:48] (348.96s)
that becomes, but that is sort of
[05:50] (350.96s)
something that people will want to do
[05:52] (352.24s)
but not be afraid of doing.
[05:54] (354.00s)
Yeah. So the the one of the most
[05:56] (356.72s)
important uh benefits of the browser uh
[05:59] (359.92s)
where AI lives on the browser is that
[06:02] (362.48s)
your data that's on the client is just
[06:04] (364.48s)
still on the client. Um, we don't we
[06:06] (366.48s)
don't actually have access to any of it.
[06:08] (368.56s)
Uh this is very unlike like people who
[06:11] (371.60s)
are trying to build desktop apps that go
[06:13] (373.92s)
and connect to your uh uh data that
[06:17] (377.12s)
lives on the server like through MCP uh
[06:19] (379.68s)
setup like like once you uh give your
[06:22] (382.32s)
oath to the MCP servers um and connect
[06:25] (385.12s)
your uh AI client to your remote MCP
[06:28] (388.24s)
servers then uh the access to data is
[06:30] (390.96s)
like way worse than what uh you know you
[06:33] (393.44s)
you you do through the browser where
[06:34] (394.96s)
every data still lives on the client
[06:36] (396.40s)
side. We don't actually have any
[06:37] (397.60s)
connection to any of the servers that
[06:38] (398.96s)
are having your third party data. It's
[06:41] (401.20s)
only used on demand when the AI thinks
[06:43] (403.92s)
it's uh going to need that tool to
[06:46] (406.08s)
answer your prompt. For example, you
[06:48] (408.08s)
say, "Hey, like can you summarize all my
[06:49] (409.84s)
Android Slack messages?" It's going to
[06:51] (411.76s)
use Slack as a tab on your browser uh
[06:54] (414.56s)
just like how you as a human would.
[06:56] (416.40s)
Instead, it's the AI opening those tabs
[06:58] (418.16s)
and like reading through your messages
[06:59] (419.52s)
and like giving you the answer. But it
[07:01] (421.60s)
doesn't have like like entire access to
[07:03] (423.76s)
your Slack. It's it's it's only if
[07:05] (425.84s)
you're already logged in and we don't
[07:07] (427.76s)
have actually access to any of your
[07:09] (429.36s)
passwords. We cannot log in again. It's
[07:11] (431.92s)
just the cookies that are being used.
[07:13] (433.84s)
So, uh it's a lot more secure way to
[07:16] (436.48s)
implement the client uh side server side
[07:19] (439.52s)
hybrid architecture than like u having a
[07:22] (442.08s)
desktop app and giving it access to all
[07:23] (443.84s)
your like emails and calendar and slack
[07:26] (446.00s)
and messages. That's way worse than like
[07:28] (448.24s)
what the browser enables. And you can
[07:31] (451.04s)
ignore you can just basically not
[07:32] (452.88s)
utilize those prompts. Um, comet is
[07:35] (455.52s)
still like a regular browser that
[07:37] (457.68s)
doesn't actually like like use anything
[07:39] (459.52s)
more than what Chrome does. And uh you
[07:42] (462.08s)
can actually choose not to like take the
[07:44] (464.48s)
power of comet for all these personal
[07:45] (465.84s)
search use cases and just use it like a
[07:47] (467.60s)
regular browser summarize web pages and
[07:49] (469.92s)
like help you search over YouTube, do
[07:51] (471.68s)
some searching over LinkedIn. Those are
[07:53] (473.84s)
all like use cases where none of your
[07:55] (475.36s)
personal data is necessary and still uh
[07:57] (477.36s)
you'll feel the power of AI for
[07:58] (478.80s)
day-to-day browsing.
[07:59] (479.84s)
Right. It kind of streamlines if you're
[08:01] (481.68s)
using AI already, a certain chatbot. You
[08:03] (483.76s)
don't have to switch between tabs.
[08:04] (484.80s)
That's what I
[08:05] (485.28s)
Exactly. You don't have to like you
[08:06] (486.88s)
don't have to open uh another tab your
[08:09] (489.60s)
favorite AI could be chat GPT uh or any
[08:12] (492.48s)
of the other things and and and uh you
[08:14] (494.08s)
don't have to copy paste uh something
[08:16] (496.08s)
from the web or ask it to like change it
[08:18] (498.00s)
and then go it back and then take the
[08:19] (499.68s)
chat GPT output put it back in your
[08:21] (501.68s)
Google doc or put it in your Gmail uh
[08:24] (504.48s)
this is like a lot of um uh several
[08:27] (507.04s)
steps of like wasteful mundane work that
[08:29] (509.28s)
can be with just comet
[08:30] (510.80s)
it's a UI thing right which you've been
[08:32] (512.32s)
able to rethink that was you know
[08:33] (513.84s)
perplexity's original vision just with
[08:35] (515.68s)
the chatbot
[08:36] (516.48s)
and and the tool use the the router the
[08:38] (518.56s)
the AI router decides to just uh invoke
[08:41] (521.52s)
the right tools
[08:42] (522.56s)
for someone like me or you know many
[08:45] (525.04s)
people who are in tech or report on tech
[08:47] (527.60s)
I mean we're constantly switching
[08:48] (528.80s)
between tabs but for more mainstream
[08:51] (531.68s)
adoption right how do you sort of sell
[08:53] (533.76s)
that proposition how do you get this
[08:56] (536.16s)
bigger and what's the weight list at
[08:57] (537.68s)
right now if you can share
[08:59] (539.60s)
um I believe it's like you know um more
[09:02] (542.24s)
than half a million people are on the
[09:03] (543.68s)
wait list I don't have the exact numbers
[09:05] (545.52s)
right now. Um and uh our goal is to
[09:08] (548.88s)
first serve that that population and
[09:11] (551.52s)
then expand to the mainstream. Um this
[09:14] (554.08s)
is a pretty uh compute intensive
[09:16] (556.24s)
product. Um every agent query has a lot
[09:18] (558.96s)
of like subqueries and tool calls and
[09:21] (561.36s)
like you know uh reasoning models
[09:23] (563.28s)
applied to them. So it's actually not
[09:24] (564.80s)
going to be easy to scale this uh for
[09:27] (567.52s)
and and keep it as a free product. Uh so
[09:29] (569.84s)
we're trying to figure out the right uh
[09:31] (571.76s)
way to like you know what are the
[09:34] (574.08s)
minimum essential features that we want
[09:35] (575.84s)
to optimize for everybody and keep it
[09:38] (578.08s)
fast and free and cheap and what are
[09:40] (580.32s)
things that actually are like truly
[09:41] (581.76s)
useful that when you're actually using
[09:44] (584.08s)
it uh it makes sense to upsell you or uh
[09:46] (586.88s)
charge you based on like consumption
[09:48] (588.56s)
usage like you know oh for this one
[09:50] (590.00s)
prompt maybe you can pay a certain few
[09:51] (591.60s)
cents and that could uh introduce a
[09:53] (593.76s)
completely new uh type of uh pricing in
[09:56] (596.08s)
AI the usage based pricing which what
[09:58] (598.24s)
everybody wants. to move towards um and
[10:00] (600.40s)
and and honestly can make AI a lot more
[10:02] (602.40s)
cost efficient to scale.
[10:04] (604.08s)
Is there more urgency though because I
[10:06] (606.32s)
will note that on the day that you
[10:07] (607.92s)
released Comet,
[10:09] (609.60s)
OpenAI had its own announcement. Um not
[10:12] (612.64s)
announcement, I'm sorry, a report, maybe
[10:14] (614.64s)
a well placed report, um that they'd be
[10:17] (617.44s)
coming up with their own AI browser.
[10:19] (619.04s)
Does that sort of make the race more
[10:21] (621.12s)
urgent for you to figure out a way to
[10:22] (622.72s)
offer this for free or at least features
[10:24] (624.48s)
for free?
[10:25] (625.84s)
Um definitely. uh but uh you know um at
[10:30] (630.00s)
the end of the day decisions are based
[10:31] (631.36s)
on what infrastructure we have to serve
[10:33] (633.60s)
and not whether they you know they
[10:35] (635.44s)
they're going to release something um
[10:37] (637.28s)
definitely we'll move as fast as we can
[10:39] (639.12s)
we are um and um you know like think
[10:41] (641.76s)
about it like we started working on this
[10:43] (643.76s)
project maybe 7 months ago um and and I
[10:46] (646.56s)
would say this is our longest ever
[10:47] (647.84s)
project we've done for most companies
[10:49] (649.44s)
like seven months is pretty normal um
[10:51] (651.68s)
and um I think we should be able to like
[10:55] (655.84s)
scale up the usage pretty fast in the
[10:58] (658.16s)
next couple of months. I think it should
[10:59] (659.60s)
be a lot more mainstream than
[11:00] (660.88s)
Does it does it raise urgency for you
[11:02] (662.96s)
guys to raise more money? I mean, the
[11:04] (664.80s)
capital is out there and I've heard
[11:06] (666.40s)
from, you know, other investors that are
[11:08] (668.24s)
very eager to get into perplexity, a
[11:10] (670.64s)
piece of that pie. Does that raise does
[11:12] (672.56s)
that raise the idea of maybe raising
[11:14] (674.08s)
money so that you can get this in more
[11:16] (676.64s)
Um, we have we have a lot of funding.
[11:19] (679.04s)
Uh, we raised a lot of capital. So,
[11:20] (680.48s)
we're not in any urgency on the capital
[11:22] (682.24s)
side. Um what we are more interested in
[11:24] (684.40s)
is making sure the browser has really
[11:26] (686.40s)
extremely good retention. Um and um u
[11:30] (690.32s)
like a large majority of the people who
[11:32] (692.40s)
install it turn it into their default
[11:34] (694.08s)
browser because once that happens uh the
[11:36] (696.80s)
query volume the number of queries per
[11:38] (698.48s)
day both the organic queries and the
[11:40] (700.16s)
agent queries are going to shoot up by
[11:42] (702.40s)
by by big multiple and uh that requires
[11:45] (705.76s)
us to go and rebuild our search
[11:47] (707.36s)
infrastructure again to uh scale the
[11:49] (709.44s)
usage because on on the common browser
[11:51] (711.60s)
perplexity is the default search engine.
[11:53] (713.76s)
So uh there's going to be a lot of
[11:55] (715.44s)
infrastructure build out to do to you
[11:57] (717.60s)
know make sure we can we can scale up.
[11:59] (719.52s)
It's not it's less about capital here
[12:01] (721.60s)
and once we are ready and like the usage
[12:03] (723.92s)
and retention is very good and the infer
[12:06] (726.40s)
is also ready and all we need to do is
[12:08] (728.08s)
scale up that that will be the right
[12:09] (729.52s)
time to uh go and raise capital.
[12:11] (731.44s)
What about a different kind of business
[12:12] (732.80s)
model like advertising?
[12:14] (734.88s)
Uh we're not that interested in that
[12:17] (737.68s)
Is that a change? because I think in the
[12:19] (739.36s)
past um Perplexity has been sort of
[12:21] (741.76s)
looking and talking to um publishers. we
[12:26] (746.08s)
were open to that and we still remain
[12:27] (747.84s)
like interested in like you know um
[12:30] (750.40s)
suggested questions being sponsored but
[12:32] (752.88s)
um I I wouldn't say that it's a priority
[12:35] (755.28s)
and uh in fact like the whole reason
[12:38] (758.72s)
people are excited about perplexity and
[12:40] (760.48s)
comet is like it truly makes the product
[12:43] (763.60s)
feel worth paying for when it actually
[12:45] (765.52s)
goes and does work for you and removes a
[12:48] (768.16s)
lot of like hours worth of like you know
[12:49] (769.76s)
some people are like oh I spend like two
[12:51] (771.60s)
three hours just comparing prices of the
[12:53] (773.28s)
same product sold by different merchants
[12:55] (775.20s)
I know Comet can do it in like under
[12:56] (776.88s)
five minutes. Uh I'm And it saves me
[12:59] (779.44s)
like 200 bucks. Uh
[13:01] (781.04s)
is that something you've seen over the
[13:02] (782.40s)
last few months though that people are
[13:03] (783.84s)
more willing to pay for something versus
[13:05] (785.52s)
getting ads?
[13:06] (786.72s)
Uh when the value is there? Yes. Like
[13:09] (789.20s)
when it actually does like like
[13:11] (791.04s)
literally if you spend two hours
[13:12] (792.48s)
preparing for this interview or if I
[13:14] (794.64s)
spend 3 hours preparing for uh my next
[13:16] (796.72s)
board meeting and if I could do that in
[13:19] (799.04s)
in a in a few minutes with Comet like I
[13:21] (801.52s)
feel like it's worth my time. And if I'm
[13:23] (803.28s)
getting paid a certain amount per per
[13:24] (804.88s)
year and I can prorate it to the dollar
[13:27] (807.28s)
per hour amount I get paid and honestly
[13:29] (809.60s)
the monthly subscription is way lower
[13:31] (811.04s)
than that,
[13:31] (811.68s)
right? But you want to be you want to be
[13:33] (813.44s)
widely adopted, right? What about the
[13:35] (815.04s)
people who aren't using it for that?
[13:36] (816.08s)
What about people who just want to
[13:37] (817.20s)
replace their existing browser the main?
[13:40] (820.00s)
Sure. I mean there's going to be there's
[13:41] (821.36s)
going to be a version of the product
[13:42] (822.32s)
that's free and like basically whatever
[13:44] (824.48s)
like non AI or just basic summarization
[13:47] (827.60s)
AI that the browser can do. Uh all that
[13:50] (830.32s)
will remain free. there's no no need to
[13:52] (832.32s)
charge people for that and I think
[13:53] (833.76s)
Chrome will also keep that free. Uh the
[13:56] (836.40s)
paid uh features are going to come more
[13:58] (838.48s)
from real productivity use cases. Uh
[14:01] (841.04s)
this whole behavior of people asking
[14:02] (842.88s)
questions about their own calendars or
[14:04] (844.80s)
emails or their own personal uh
[14:06] (846.64s)
behaviors on the web, that's a new
[14:08] (848.96s)
behavior. Uh it's not happened before.
[14:11] (851.68s)
So when that behavior grows, there's
[14:13] (853.52s)
going to be ways to monetize that and
[14:15] (855.04s)
and and without having to like like uh
[14:17] (857.52s)
use ads. And I think that's that's where
[14:20] (860.24s)
the promise is. We we got to try, right?
[14:22] (862.48s)
Like everybody goes around Google
[14:24] (864.40s)
and and ends up like just selling your
[14:26] (866.08s)
data to advertisers and that's not
[14:28] (868.24s)
and it's it's early days too. Um let's
[14:30] (870.64s)
let's talk a little bit about shifting
[14:32] (872.16s)
AI dynamics at large. Arand um there's
[14:34] (874.56s)
been so much news. I mean Zuckerberg
[14:36] (876.72s)
he's spending hundreds of billions of
[14:38] (878.24s)
dollars to really own the stack from
[14:39] (879.76s)
talent to compute. This morning that
[14:41] (881.60s)
huge announcement up to 5 gawatts of
[14:44] (884.00s)
compute capacity models not giving up
[14:46] (886.56s)
there. I had heard too that they had
[14:49] (889.12s)
made he Zuckerberg had tried to make a
[14:51] (891.28s)
play for perplexity before the scale AI
[14:53] (893.52s)
deal. Um I'm sure there's not much you
[14:56] (896.08s)
can say about that but even just this
[14:57] (897.76s)
broader proposition why not go with the
[15:00] (900.56s)
scale and resources of a platform like
[15:02] (902.64s)
Meta or an Apple or a big tech company.
[15:06] (906.88s)
I mean I think there's the world needs
[15:08] (908.88s)
like little tech to win right? Um if if
[15:11] (911.52s)
it's all about big tech winning all the
[15:13] (913.04s)
time then there's no interest. I think
[15:15] (915.36s)
uh um AI is the first time like uh
[15:19] (919.04s)
there's opportunity for a new player to
[15:20] (920.88s)
come and disrupt the existing market and
[15:23] (923.28s)
and and the big tech can still keep
[15:24] (924.72s)
winning like for example Meta can make
[15:26] (926.64s)
their existing suite of products better
[15:28] (928.16s)
with AI or uh Apple can make their
[15:31] (931.12s)
phones sell better with AI like and and
[15:33] (933.52s)
perplexity can still exist on all these
[15:35] (935.44s)
platforms and have its own business. Um
[15:38] (938.48s)
and our goal is actually to give an
[15:40] (940.48s)
alternative to the world to Google uh
[15:42] (942.56s)
Google Chrome, Google search, um and and
[15:45] (945.28s)
like Google Assistant, Gemini, uh like
[15:48] (948.00s)
like all the workspace integrations they
[15:49] (949.84s)
have done. Uh there needs to be an
[15:51] (951.60s)
alternative for that like that is the
[15:53] (953.52s)
true monopoly like 90% market share. Uh
[15:56] (956.64s)
and uh we got to go for that and if we
[15:58] (958.88s)
don't try then uh nobody else will. So,
[16:01] (961.36s)
you're saying basically the pie is big
[16:02] (962.64s)
enough for everyone, but at the same
[16:04] (964.24s)
time, I mean, look at the Google
[16:05] (965.52s)
Windsurf deal, right? And Microsoft
[16:08] (968.16s)
Inflection and Google character AI,
[16:10] (970.96s)
they're acquiring all of the talent, but
[16:12] (972.96s)
they're leaving these sort of shells of
[16:14] (974.48s)
a company behind, how does that company
[16:16] (976.96s)
that's left behind, that's little tech,
[16:18] (978.56s)
how do they survive without their key
[16:20] (980.40s)
engineers, their founders, their CEOs?
[16:22] (982.96s)
Well, they shouldn't have uh the CEO
[16:25] (985.20s)
shouldn't have gone for the deal. So
[16:26] (986.56s)
there's that that's they survive by
[16:29] (989.60s)
fighting.
[16:31] (991.44s)
I guess that means too that you're
[16:33] (993.04s)
you're not going for any kind of deal.
[16:35] (995.36s)
No, we we plan to remain independent and
[16:37] (997.84s)
I I think the browser potential is so
[16:40] (1000.80s)
massive that uh the the future looks
[16:43] (1003.52s)
amazing for us. It's still all on
[16:45] (1005.44s)
execution and uh you know we have to
[16:47] (1007.60s)
earn our right to become a valuable
[16:49] (1009.60s)
company but the way you get to that is
[16:51] (1011.92s)
to work on hard projects and uh you know
[16:55] (1015.12s)
the browser is way harder project than
[16:56] (1016.72s)
shipping another chatbot
[16:58] (1018.40s)
and uh that's not even the end of the
[17:00] (1020.64s)
story uh getting it on all the platforms
[17:03] (1023.36s)
mobile uh both both mobile operating
[17:06] (1026.08s)
systems Windows Mac OS and uh trying to
[17:09] (1029.36s)
build these task managers asynchronous
[17:11] (1031.84s)
processes running and like you know uh
[17:14] (1034.16s)
being your uh OS that runs all your work
[17:17] (1037.28s)
life or personal life on on the web,
[17:19] (1039.76s)
right?
[17:20] (1040.16s)
That's just so much value if you can do
[17:21] (1041.68s)
that for every single person on the
[17:22] (1042.88s)
planet. Like you can you can build a
[17:24] (1044.32s)
completely new business uh out of
[17:26] (1046.24s)
nowhere and um uh and and the models are
[17:29] (1049.52s)
getting cheaper. Like for example, you
[17:30] (1050.96s)
see like Kimi an open source model came
[17:33] (1053.44s)
out from this lab called Moonshot and um
[17:36] (1056.16s)
it's almost as good as Cloud for Opus
[17:38] (1058.40s)
and it's open source. So we're we're
[17:40] (1060.72s)
we're constantly going to benefit from
[17:42] (1062.08s)
all that and um keep post training these
[17:44] (1064.08s)
models and bring down the cost.
[17:46] (1066.00s)
I like what one of our viewers called
[17:47] (1067.44s)
it. Um this was army knife access to
[17:50] (1070.08s)
data permission to execute playments
[17:51] (1071.84s)
more. It's a good way of describing sort
[17:53] (1073.36s)
of a browser. Um okay, we've talked
[17:57] (1077.28s)
about this before too. I mean when we
[17:58] (1078.96s)
first met I called perplex this is a
[18:00] (1080.72s)
long time ago, right? I called
[18:01] (1081.68s)
perplexity an AI rapper which no one
[18:04] (1084.00s)
likes that term. But we also talked
[18:06] (1086.64s)
I think I think I think people are
[18:07] (1087.92s)
warmed up to it like perplexity
[18:09] (1089.84s)
it means something different now right?
[18:11] (1091.52s)
Yeah cursor perplexity they're all
[18:13] (1093.36s)
rappers but they're delivering so much
[18:15] (1095.04s)
value that people are happy with it. At
[18:17] (1097.28s)
the same time though, you're also going
[18:18] (1098.64s)
deeper, right? You're fine-tuning and
[18:20] (1100.32s)
you're building your own models to
[18:22] (1102.16s)
become more competitive. And that's I
[18:23] (1103.76s)
guess why you're saying that you're not
[18:24] (1104.88s)
as worried that the model builders,
[18:26] (1106.96s)
right, with hundreds of billions of
[18:28] (1108.56s)
dollars in capital like Meta and Google
[18:30] (1110.80s)
are going to be able to take your
[18:32] (1112.08s)
market, right? Because I mean, you've
[18:34] (1114.24s)
collected even though a year or two
[18:35] (1115.92s)
years has is a short amount of time,
[18:37] (1117.60s)
you've been collecting that data. Does
[18:39] (1119.12s)
that widen your moat?
[18:41] (1121.60s)
I mean I I think it certainly helps to
[18:44] (1124.00s)
have like a good understanding of every
[18:46] (1126.32s)
user to make the service better for
[18:48] (1128.32s)
them. Um in in AI that that's often
[18:50] (1130.80s)
referred to as memory. Um but it it's
[18:53] (1133.60s)
not just about the volume of data you
[18:55] (1135.44s)
have to go train models on top. Actually
[18:57] (1137.84s)
I don't think Anthropic even uh has that
[19:00] (1140.40s)
much user data but they end up training
[19:02] (1142.64s)
the best models like the the chat bots
[19:04] (1144.64s)
are not even having the the scale of
[19:06] (1146.40s)
usage that we have but they end up
[19:08] (1148.56s)
training the best models in the market
[19:10] (1150.16s)
right so uh I'm not sure if data is that
[19:13] (1153.68s)
important for training uh the the the
[19:16] (1156.08s)
general purpose models but uh it's
[19:18] (1158.96s)
useful for making memory and
[19:20] (1160.56s)
personalization work and and and make
[19:22] (1162.48s)
the product more uh catered to the
[19:25] (1165.04s)
individual's interests and uh without
[19:27] (1167.76s)
even having to collect it by the way
[19:29] (1169.36s)
like like for example for comet like we
[19:31] (1171.92s)
we can just uh pull your history on
[19:34] (1174.24s)
demand but but still not retain any of
[19:36] (1176.32s)
those data in our servers and and uh so
[19:38] (1178.56s)
that way the data still gets to live on
[19:40] (1180.24s)
the client. uh it's just use utilized
[19:42] (1182.88s)
for that one specific prompt on and then
[19:45] (1185.20s)
the server applies the reasoning model
[19:46] (1186.72s)
and the server applies the intelligence
[19:48] (1188.48s)
to it but if you say okay don't retain
[19:51] (1191.20s)
my data or you run the query on
[19:52] (1192.48s)
incognito mode it can still live with
[19:54] (1194.16s)
you so that you you want the sort of
[19:56] (1196.64s)
like architectural flexibility to uh
[19:59] (1199.04s)
utilize user data but not actually like
[20:01] (1201.12s)
like take it and train on it or like
[20:03] (1203.04s)
sell it to advertisers
[20:04] (1204.24s)
right that's a key point for folks
[20:05] (1205.60s)
asking in the chat too more about
[20:07] (1207.12s)
privacy um Arvin I know we've only got a
[20:09] (1209.28s)
few minutes up but you mentioned open
[20:10] (1210.48s)
source You're always great to talk to
[20:12] (1212.00s)
about this. Um, I just wonder is the US
[20:14] (1214.72s)
moving away from open source. Grock 4,
[20:17] (1217.12s)
right? Despite what Elon Musk has said
[20:19] (1219.36s)
about, you know, the philosophical
[20:21] (1221.76s)
promise and, you know, aim to have open
[20:24] (1224.16s)
source models, Grock 4 was not. Alman
[20:27] (1227.12s)
Friday night walked back his own plans
[20:29] (1229.44s)
to release an open source GPT model.
[20:31] (1231.60s)
What are the implications of that? Do we
[20:33] (1233.52s)
risk losing a global edge?
[20:36] (1236.32s)
Um, I think open AI uh should I think I
[20:40] (1240.80s)
don't think he walked back. I guess he's
[20:42] (1242.32s)
just delayed it. Um, and um I
[20:45] (1245.04s)
Do you buy it though? He cited safety,
[20:47] (1247.04s)
but I mean again it's open source is
[20:48] (1248.72s)
harder to monetize, right? So what
[20:50] (1250.40s)
incentive does he have?
[20:52] (1252.40s)
Um ecosystem ownership of the developer
[20:54] (1254.88s)
ecosystem. Um I think that's that's
[20:56] (1256.80s)
pretty big that that helps build a brand
[20:58] (1258.64s)
for your product anyway. and and uh um
[21:02] (1262.00s)
so yeah, I think I think there will be
[21:03] (1263.68s)
an American open source model that's
[21:05] (1265.04s)
pretty competitive with uh the Chinese
[21:06] (1266.64s)
ones, but we got to respect the the labs
[21:09] (1269.20s)
from China to like keep showing that you
[21:11] (1271.12s)
don't need to spend like, you know, so
[21:12] (1272.80s)
many billions of dollars to land a good
[21:14] (1274.56s)
model. I think it's very impressive what
[21:16] (1276.24s)
they're doing. So I'm I do expect like
[21:19] (1279.12s)
OpenAI or someone else to land like a
[21:21] (1281.52s)
pretty good open source model for
[21:22] (1282.80s)
America.
[21:23] (1283.76s)
Is Meta and Zuckerberg still in the
[21:25] (1285.52s)
game? Are they still going to be working
[21:26] (1286.96s)
on open source models? Is that what the
[21:28] (1288.96s)
next llama or behemoth is going to be?
[21:32] (1292.08s)
I'm not aware of like commitment to open
[21:34] (1294.48s)
source for the the super intelligence
[21:36] (1296.56s)
one. Um I mean I didn't I didn't read
[21:38] (1298.56s)
that on their announcement post. So
[21:40] (1300.80s)
maybe their strategy has changed.
[21:42] (1302.56s)
Um and sort of last question for you
[21:44] (1304.08s)
Arvent. I mean with all of the talent
[21:45] (1305.68s)
wars going on as you guys you know do
[21:48] (1308.08s)
something really difficult in the
[21:49] (1309.20s)
browser and you go deeper and fine-tune
[21:51] (1311.44s)
your own models. Um how are you hiring?
[21:53] (1313.68s)
How are you finding it? How do you
[21:55] (1315.04s)
compete with these hundred billion
[21:56] (1316.56s)
dollar hundred million dollar paychecks
[21:58] (1318.08s)
that Zuckerberg's handing out?
[22:00] (1320.00s)
Uh you compete by like like the Peter
[22:02] (1322.56s)
Theals code, competition is for losers.
[22:04] (1324.40s)
You don't compete on on that market. Um
[22:07] (1327.04s)
instead you try to like groom new talent
[22:09] (1329.60s)
and and and and throw them at hard
[22:11] (1331.60s)
problems that they didn't even know they
[22:13] (1333.28s)
could solve and they end up building the
[22:15] (1335.84s)
muscle to solve them by like sheer like
[22:17] (1337.92s)
willpower and like raw talent that they
[22:19] (1339.92s)
have but hasn't been honed yet. And uh
[22:22] (1342.72s)
we're also working on very
[22:24] (1344.08s)
differentiated problems than what others
[22:26] (1346.08s)
are focusing on. So um
[22:29] (1349.12s)
top AI researchers or are you playing in
[22:30] (1350.96s)
a different bracket?
[22:32] (1352.56s)
Yeah, we're not really like doing the
[22:33] (1353.92s)
frontier model research. Yeah,
[22:35] (1355.68s)
it might even be too late to start, but
[22:37] (1357.28s)
we're going to focus a lot on building
[22:38] (1358.72s)
models that are capable of like using
[22:40] (1360.40s)
your browser. Um, like controlling your
[22:42] (1362.80s)
tabs, like like scrolling through web
[22:44] (1364.88s)
pages, uploading documents, uh, clicking
[22:47] (1367.92s)
on the right buttons, um, or like like
[22:50] (1370.72s)
you know like just finishing up like
[22:52] (1372.56s)
some filling up forms for you like those
[22:54] (1374.24s)
kind of things. I think we plan to like
[22:56] (1376.24s)
train uh post train on top of like the
[22:59] (1379.04s)
best open source models and uh deploy
[23:01] (1381.52s)
the marcels on our browser.
[23:03] (1383.20s)
If it's too late sort of or if it may be
[23:04] (1384.96s)
too late to start building frontier
[23:06] (1386.64s)
models um what do you think especially
[23:08] (1388.96s)
from your perspective UI perspective and
[23:11] (1391.68s)
ease of use? What does Apple do from
[23:14] (1394.48s)
Um I don't know what they're supposed to
[23:16] (1396.56s)
do. I don't want to talk for them, but
[23:18] (1398.88s)
um um our goal is to train um like like
[23:22] (1402.24s)
these models ourselves that they can
[23:24] (1404.00s)
control your browser and hopefully uh be
[23:26] (1406.40s)
able to give people the option to um run
[23:29] (1409.60s)
inference on them um locally. Um I think
[23:32] (1412.96s)
I think like obviously like despite what
[23:35] (1415.12s)
we say uh on like what data lives on the
[23:37] (1417.20s)
browser, what data lives on the client,
[23:38] (1418.72s)
what data goes to the server, what is
[23:40] (1420.32s)
retained, what's not retained, there's
[23:42] (1422.32s)
still a lot of interest for people to
[23:44] (1424.08s)
like benefit from all this intelligence
[23:46] (1426.16s)
that can like actually go do work for
[23:48] (1428.64s)
Uh but still have it all run locally. uh
[23:52] (1432.40s)
and and that can only happen when you
[23:54] (1434.16s)
can um full strain on top of good open
[23:56] (1436.80s)
source models yourself and run inference
[23:59] (1439.36s)
using utilizing the local hardware,
[24:02] (1442.00s)
right? And Apple's really amazing at
[24:04] (1444.24s)
building the hardware like like they
[24:05] (1445.68s)
have the best laptops with the most
[24:07] (1447.36s)
powerful chips. Um and I'm pretty
[24:09] (1449.60s)
confident that these trillion parameter
[24:11] (1451.20s)
models at at some point will be able to
[24:13] (1453.44s)
run locally without consuming too much
[24:15] (1455.20s)
battery. Uh they have a very
[24:17] (1457.76s)
differentiated advantage there. And so
[24:20] (1460.40s)
uh by building on the Mac ecosystem like
[24:22] (1462.40s)
we hope to give that advantage to um
[24:24] (1464.48s)
like the like like people who using
[24:25] (1465.76s)
comet as well.
[24:26] (1466.88s)
Do you ultimately go from the browser to
[24:28] (1468.72s)
being able to control the physical
[24:31] (1471.04s)
desktop?
[24:32] (1472.40s)
Um I think it's interesting like there
[24:34] (1474.40s)
are there are things that live outside
[24:35] (1475.68s)
the browser that are on the uh desktop
[24:38] (1478.32s)
client that that that are still valuable
[24:41] (1481.20s)
uh tools people use on a daily basis
[24:43] (1483.04s)
like for example iMes
[24:46] (1486.08s)
um you know outlook all that stuff like
[24:49] (1489.92s)
like doesn't live on the browser as much
[24:52] (1492.24s)
so if we turn uh the browser into an MCP
[24:55] (1495.04s)
client to like interact with these apps
[24:57] (1497.12s)
I think that could be interesting uh we
[24:59] (1499.44s)
are going to explore that too
[25:02] (1502.48s)
Marvin, it is now 30 minutes after the
[25:05] (1505.04s)
hour. Thank you so much for taking the