[00:01] (1.20s)
strangle just because you just
[00:02] (2.33s)
never know.
[00:03] (3.37s)
>> Good advice good perspective.
[00:04] (4.77s)
Well meantime, our next guest
[00:06] (6.27s)
thinks tensions between
[00:07] (7.61s)
President Trump and Fed Chair
[00:08] (8.74s)
Jerome Powell could reach a
[00:10] (10.51s)
boiling point by the next
[00:11] (11.74s)
interest rate decision,
[00:12] (12.85s)
scheduled for later this month.
[00:14] (14.25s)
Ben Evans is founder and chief
[00:15] (15.48s)
investment officer at Fed Watch
[00:17] (17.25s)
Advisors. Ben, thank you for
[00:18] (18.15s)
being with us. I mean, my
[00:19] (19.82s)
goodness, I can't remember what
[00:21] (21.42s)
day it was this week, but it was
[00:23] (23.12s)
a long day and a short day all
[00:25] (25.93s)
in one. We had we thought we
[00:26] (26.73s)
knew one thing, and then an hour
[00:28] (28.70s)
and a half later, we knew
[00:30] (30.33s)
something different. Even though
[00:31] (31.26s)
the fed is supposed to be
[00:32] (32.30s)
independent, apolitical, there
[00:34] (34.00s)
are also people. Jerome Powell
[00:35] (35.30s)
is a person. How how is it
[00:37] (37.17s)
really possible for him and the
[00:39] (39.34s)
committee to move forward and
[00:41] (41.54s)
continue to do their job,
[00:43] (43.61s)
seemingly unaffected by this? I
[00:45] (45.11s)
mean, isn't everyone just going
[00:46] (46.98s)
to be shrouding every move,
[00:48] (48.68s)
decision and discussion point in
[00:50] (50.68s)
sort of a curiosity point? Why
[00:52] (52.35s)
did they really do this?
[00:54] (54.85s)
>> Yeah, I think that's right.
[00:55] (55.45s)
Courtney, you get now far more
[00:57] (57.39s)
scrutiny on this July meeting
[00:58] (58.62s)
than we would normally have. You
[01:00] (60.53s)
know, irrespective of the
[01:02] (62.49s)
economic data. You know, we've
[01:03] (63.46s)
got, you know, reasonable
[01:04] (65.00s)
inflation data this week. And we
[01:06] (66.93s)
had good employment data the
[01:08] (68.10s)
other day and actually yesterday
[01:09] (69.80s)
with retail sales too. So we got
[01:11] (71.64s)
an economy that's strong. Keep
[01:12] (72.87s)
this fed on hold for the time
[01:14] (74.54s)
being. But the attention to this
[01:16] (76.44s)
meeting is only building up now.
[01:17] (77.88s)
You saw overnight Governor
[01:19] (79.98s)
Waller really coming out with a
[01:21] (81.41s)
I would call a pounding table
[01:22] (82.88s)
view of like we can cut rates
[01:25] (85.02s)
now. So it kind of adds into the
[01:27] (87.29s)
mix of this, what it's going to
[01:29] (89.16s)
be happening here at this
[01:30] (90.06s)
meeting, you know, are they
[01:31] (91.83s)
really tilting towards easing
[01:32] (92.66s)
while we actually have an
[01:33] (93.99s)
economy that's strong? I think
[01:35] (95.16s)
that tension kind of displays
[01:36] (96.13s)
itself this week in the markets,
[01:37] (97.66s)
when it really became apparent
[01:39] (99.20s)
that they wanted to remove
[01:40] (100.47s)
Powell and you saw the
[01:41] (101.73s)
volatility reappear. I think
[01:42] (102.94s)
this is what we could expect
[01:44] (104.27s)
going into this July meeting.
[01:46] (106.21s)
Because the VIX is low, the
[01:48] (108.04s)
probability for a cut is price
[01:49] (109.98s)
near zero. So you could get some
[01:52] (112.21s)
tension here I think as all the
[01:53] (113.18s)
scrutiny comes together.
[01:54] (114.15s)
>> Hey Ben it's Courtney Garcia
[01:55] (115.81s)
here. The other Courtney who's
[01:57] (117.68s)
on the desk. When we're looking
[01:58] (118.52s)
at this. We've clearly had a lot
[02:00] (120.35s)
of headlines. Right. And at this
[02:01] (121.99s)
point in time, Trump is saying,
[02:03] (123.22s)
okay, he's not going to fire
[02:05] (125.06s)
Powell. But clearly there is an
[02:06] (126.06s)
issue there. They're going head
[02:07] (127.39s)
to head. He doesn't want him in.
[02:09] (129.29s)
So at what point does it matter
[02:11] (131.23s)
if he actually fires him or not.
[02:12] (132.37s)
Because at this point he's kind
[02:14] (134.40s)
of out the door. And what does
[02:16] (136.20s)
that do to rate changes, if
[02:17] (137.47s)
anything at all, or anything
[02:18] (138.44s)
that we should expect as
[02:20] (140.14s)
investors?
[02:20] (140.41s)
>> Yeah. I think what you're
[02:21] (141.47s)
adding to is basically about the
[02:23] (143.18s)
shadow chair, right. Ultimately,
[02:24] (144.11s)
we all know that power will be
[02:25] (145.51s)
out in about a year from now,
[02:28] (148.11s)
actually less than a year. And
[02:29] (149.28s)
whether he actually gets removed
[02:30] (150.42s)
in between or not, it's really
[02:32] (152.19s)
about this committee and then
[02:33] (153.15s)
about this next candidate and
[02:34] (154.49s)
how that candidate is going to
[02:36] (156.32s)
interact outside of the
[02:37] (157.06s)
committee. I think that's what
[02:38] (158.32s)
the market will pay attention
[02:40] (160.03s)
to. But nonetheless, it's still
[02:41] (161.59s)
a committee. So as you had this
[02:43] (163.50s)
example of Waller really making
[02:45] (165.26s)
a strong case for a cut doesn't
[02:47] (167.13s)
mean that the cut actually will
[02:48] (168.97s)
happen. It's still the FOMC that
[02:50] (170.34s)
makes that decision. Ultimately.
[02:52] (172.21s)
I do think though that, you
[02:54] (174.07s)
know, could you get some sort of
[02:56] (176.21s)
group think here where people
[02:57] (177.31s)
are all going to be on the table
[02:59] (179.28s)
saying, well, a cut is
[03:00] (180.35s)
definitely possible. I think
[03:01] (181.31s)
that's the biggest signal out of
[03:02] (182.85s)
this meeting is that from here,
[03:04] (184.88s)
what cuts will happen, how soon?
[03:06] (186.95s)
And there was a little change
[03:08] (188.15s)
here with Daly the other day of
[03:10] (190.29s)
indicating that she's also on
[03:11] (191.22s)
board for this, this next round
[03:13] (193.16s)
of cuts. So Powell out of the
[03:14] (194.53s)
way. Yes or no? It's the
[03:16] (196.36s)
committee that drives it. But I
[03:17] (197.93s)
do think they will make signal
[03:20] (200.30s)
more cuts from here.
[03:20] (200.77s)
>> Hey, Ben what's going on?
[03:21] (201.63s)
It's great to see you as always.
[03:23] (203.77s)
Just quickly. I know you give a
[03:25] (205.34s)
lot of great insights about the
[03:26] (206.44s)
fed, and typically we focus a
[03:28] (208.68s)
lot of our attention around
[03:29] (209.91s)
like, large publicly traded
[03:30] (210.64s)
companies. But there's a large
[03:32] (212.48s)
cohort in terms of the small
[03:33] (213.41s)
business community that perhaps
[03:35] (215.05s)
isn't feeling the same euphoria
[03:36] (216.75s)
as as might be reflected in the
[03:38] (218.72s)
stock market. Can you speak to
[03:39] (219.65s)
how rate cuts might affect the
[03:41] (221.29s)
front end of the curve? And
[03:42] (222.66s)
those companies that are
[03:44] (224.36s)
probably borrowing with short
[03:44] (224.96s)
term variable rate debt, and how
[03:47] (227.63s)
perhaps that might be presenting
[03:49] (229.29s)
a tug of war between what we're
[03:51] (231.33s)
seeing from full employment
[03:53] (233.73s)
versus what we're seeing from
[03:54] (234.33s)
the small business community?
[03:56] (236.20s)
>> Yeah. And I think that's a
[03:57] (237.60s)
good point, because you have
[03:59] (239.10s)
companies that you mentioned
[04:00] (240.24s)
that are very reliant on short
[04:01] (241.81s)
term funding. And so rate cuts
[04:03] (243.58s)
there would potentially help, so
[04:05] (245.25s)
to speak. In other words, if you
[04:07] (247.01s)
do get cuts, the yield curve
[04:08] (248.31s)
should normalize further. The
[04:09] (249.62s)
short term rates should get
[04:10] (250.68s)
lower. And those companies
[04:11] (251.42s)
should be able to borrow at a
[04:13] (253.65s)
lower rate. Yet, you know, it
[04:15] (255.69s)
may not happen really because of
[04:17] (257.22s)
the strength of the economy and
[04:19] (259.29s)
that that that difference there
[04:20] (260.96s)
of when it will happen. And the
[04:22] (262.30s)
rate difference for these
[04:23] (263.60s)
companies, I think, matters. I
[04:24] (265.00s)
also think for these companies,
[04:26] (266.50s)
their business outlook has been
[04:27] (267.67s)
clouded by the tariffs. And if
[04:29] (269.17s)
you look at the Atlanta Fed,
[04:31] (271.47s)
they put out a business
[04:32] (272.40s)
inflation outlook that's
[04:33] (273.67s)
actually still quite high
[04:35] (275.07s)
relative to where, you know, say
[04:36] (276.64s)
market based expectations are
[04:38] (278.61s)
for inflation. So these
[04:39] (279.91s)
companies are sitting in a bit
[04:41] (281.11s)
of a pickle here. So rate cuts
[04:43] (283.08s)
actually would help them a lot.
[04:44] (284.55s)
People have always connected
[04:46] (286.15s)
small caps or rate cuts as a
[04:47] (287.42s)
positive thing that could see a
[04:48] (288.59s)
big rally. I think that would
[04:50] (290.42s)
actually be the case. But if
[04:51] (291.76s)
we're getting quick cut